Go back
You Obviously Elected a Criminal

You Obviously Elected a Criminal

Debates


@Suzianne said
Exactly. But only if they are a full person. Three-fifths of a person need not apply.
Maybe we should downgrade you to two-fifths of a person, based on your forum behavior.


@Arkturos said
Only a virtue-signaling white person would write such a thing.
What a buffoon.

If you don't understand a post, all you have to do is not reply to it.


@Arkturos said
Maybe we should downgrade you to two-fifths of a person, based on your forum behavior.
Not quite ever getting the point.

Got it.


A bit "yippi ".
Is that the rite spelling?


@AverageJoe1 said
Apologies, did not kknow you serioously asked if I would shoot a person who invaded and would not leave my house.
I would do no such thing..
Ask a 'nother question. I seldom get questions. I feel like a guy on the 11th row at a tent revival in south Mississippi, with Sonhouse and King David preaching their guts out, but never asking questions!!!
The King: "What you see is hiding!!!", such as that.
Very interesting. 😆

Now to your questions:
-Would I be "cool" with a home invader? No. If he was peaceful, I would escort him off my property into some public area.
-Are you illegal? No idea.

😆


@spruce112358 said
Very interesting. 😆

Now to your questions:
-Would I be "cool" with a home invader? No. If he was peaceful, I would escort him off my property into some public area.
-Are you illegal? No idea.

😆
No idea? Man you men keep us looking for level ground.

Here is where you said if I (eg, run a red light), which all of us have, that I am illegal

Think carefully before you answer. If there is a SINGLE law you are breaking - right now - then you are "here illegally."


@AverageJoe1 said
Whew, I thought you had said totally dismantle.......something like this....

"""So you are ok with Trump totally dismantling Social security,""""

But that is different than the link you sent me. I think you meant to send. link that says totally dismantle, Sonhouse. We are all REALLY busy with all due respects, I am having enough with Marauder's crusade to make us ...[text shortened]... body get rich!! I try to follow him, and then you throw in this gordian knot.
Who's on first!
So cutting some 80,000 SS workers is NOT dismantling? This is not going after efficiency. This is going after ANY agency that pays out money.
SCREW 70 million living on SS, SCREW children now dying around the world from starvation and lack of medicines. SCREW our veterans out of VA hospital benefits, like the contracts canceled that allows surgical instruments to be sterilized as just one tiny example.
What this is is abrogation of responsibility.
They want to kill FEMA, leave disasters of biblical proportions up to the states who don't have the recourses to deal with major brush fires or floods or hurricanes or earthquakes or tornados.
Trump wants to pull out of NATO, side with Putin, a complete reversal of our national interest of the last 80 frigging years.
And you go YEA, save money, SCREW those idiots who can't retire on their own money.
Even though SS is OUR money if you remember. I have contributed my 6% for SIXTY FRIGGING YEARS and if they cut us off we will be in the streets but hey, government efficiency is king, just like King Trump.


@AverageJoe1 said
No, I see your point. I see your discontent.
But look what he is doing. Righting our ship, Sunhouse. You can hate him all you wants, but if you could possibly pull yourself away from personal venom, and look at what he is doing for the country, then you can only see good things. The only bad thing I can think of is some people might get rich. Why don’t you write abou ...[text shortened]... eople that will get Rich because of his movements. I don’t care what they get. What is your problem.
What the hell drugs are you one now, me never saying why I hate Trump? It's not enough to have started an insurrection, people dying on Jan 6, Trump getting impeached TWICE, once for trying to intimidate Zelensky, give me dirt on Biden or you can forget your half billion in military aid.
This is the mark of a PRESIDENT? Who are you trying to kid?
Then there is the stolen TOP secret and ABOVE top secret docs that you poo poo and so for you national security is no big deal but for people like me who DID have a top secret clearance is IS a bid deal. A VERY big deal and NOBODY should be able to get away with blatant theft of HUNDREDS of TS and above TS docs, and it is an absolute fact if that had been you or I doing that we would have been in jail ALREADY for years and MAYBE get out in 30 years.
Then the really stupid tariff wars tanking our market and the Bonds issues will not fix themselves by Trump going OOPS, so sorry, I will pause for a couple of months.
We have an utter IDIOT madman at the helm and the entire planet in in uproar over all his so called policies.
No more allies, except his mentor Putin.
Wants to pull out of NATO.

Not even counting the FACT JACK that he is a CONVICTED FELON but OF COURSE anything Trump does, ANY FRIGGING THING TRUMP DOES, is ok with you.

Does that explain why I hate that son of a bitch?


@Suzianne said
No, it was law enforcement doing their damned job, unlike anyone in his Cabinet.
And unlike anyone in the Senate who could have had him a CONVICTED impeached president and kicked out on his sorry ass.
But they are too spineless, ZERO balls and have totally given the Senate away to Trump.
I just hope people will take that to heart in 2026 and vote those spineless bastards out of office and get people in who reassert the independence of the senate as one of the checks and balances on either of the other two branches of government.


@AverageJoe1 said
You take a more liberal stance than I do, that's all. Note that you did not answer my question, am I illegal.
So, in effect you are playing word games, a standard pastime of liberal people. There are many grey areas on the forum, like your wanting to use MY money to pay the tuttions of college grads. Then that thought bleeds into Suzianne's saying that the money use ...[text shortened]... try walkied into your house and sat down? I think your friends here would tell you to live with it.
So you take a more right wing stance on that, bending the constitution to your own sick will.
It says PERSON, Get over it, that is our constitution and it means exactly what it says and if Trump can just arrest anyone and just say these are violent criminals without even giving those folks the ability to fight their case in court, but instead, be offed to an El Salvador prison with no recourse, no lawyers, no contact with lawyers and ALL of that ONLY on the word of Trump.
You can't see how that is ABSOLUTELY no difference between those actions and the actions of a 15th century KING?


@AverageJoe1 said
No, it means what he did was not criminal. He did do those 34 misdemeanors, for which he was charged ....but what are his crimes which you allude to?
In any other universe Trump would have been in prison several times over and they were NOT misdemeanors they were FELONS, that is what the COURTS SAID.
That makes it official as much as you might HATE the outcome that is the LEGAL response to his criminal actions and people, A BUNCH of people have gone to jail over the same crimes. Trump was not persecuted because he was Trump, he was CONVICTED because he broke the LAW.
But for you, Trump IS a king and needs to be treated as one, that is, one who is LITERALLY above the law, The KING IS the law and if he just SAYS this dude is a criminal and I am sending him to prison in El Salvador, So be it, that person IS now a criminal.
Just a tiny bit off the constitution.


@AverageJoe1 said
Bein a faerie man. Got enough of those

As you don’t answer, do I win this one? Ask me a question.
Maybe you need reading comprehension 101, HE DID ASK A QUESTION and you refused to answer that question.


@AverageJoe1 said
No idea? Man you men keep us looking for level ground.

Here is where you said if I (eg, run a red light), which all of us have, that I am illegal

Think carefully before you answer. If there is a SINGLE law you are breaking - right now - then you are "here illegally."
So since you are "here illegally" should you get due process? Or should we just deport you to some country that doesn't mind miscreants? 😆


@spruce112358 said
So since you are "here illegally" should you get due process? Or should we just deport you to some country that doesn't mind miscreants? 😆
Honestly? Have an EXIT place at the border, and take them there to head south. (makes no diff where they are domiciled ) . Why all the fancy stuff. Like , give them a cell phone, which we cannot afford to give to them.
You see, you muddy up your comment with irrelevant stuff, like Marauder does when I ask him what HE thinks about men vs women sports, and he writes back about the government and people who vascillate one day to the next about if they are a girl or a boy. Totally irrelevant, don't you see. He was asked what HE thinks.
So, you talk here about 'some country'. Who cares what country? And why is it up to us to decide if their country doesn't want their miscreants back,,,,we do not care what country they go to, just get out of ours. Really, is this too logical and common sense for you?


@sonhouse said
So cutting some 80,000 SS workers is NOT dismantling? This is not going after efficiency. This is going after ANY agency that pays out money.
SCREW 70 million living on SS, SCREW children now dying around the world from starvation and lack of medicines. SCREW our veterans out of VA hospital benefits, like the contracts canceled that allows surgical instruments to be sterili ...[text shortened]... y cut us off we will be in the streets but hey, government efficiency is king, just like King Trump.
Cutting 80k workers is not 'totally' dismantling. I think it will still be operating, a lot of people are using those checks to live on.
You said totally. Take a nap.
Who's got time to go thru and answer your posts? Whew.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.