@joe-shmo saidIt’s a vlog with the two dullest hosts imaginable.
The Problem with Black Lives Matter.
A soft spoken, extremely well composed rational voice in a world going off the rails
[youtube]-Sk4-p_0pcU[/youtube]
I can’t sot throigh 50 minutes of that listening to some rapper (and social commentator... is that seriously a thing) talk about stuff everyone knows. Who would do that to themselves?
@shavixmir saidPffff....
It’s a vlog with the two dullest hosts imaginable.
I can’t sot throigh 50 minutes of that listening to some rapper (and social commentator... is that seriously a thing) talk about stuff everyone knows. Who would do that to themselves?
🙄
@joe-shmo saidThe one that concurs with the guy in video who’s claiming there’s a “problem with BLM”
What is my opinion???
🙄
Your obviously someone who is of the opinion there’s a “problem with BLM” otherwise why would you recommend the video in the way that you did.
It’s not rocket science is it?
@kevcvs57 saidSummarizing an hours worth of content would take me two hours ( I'm not a stenographer ). Trust me, it could not be further from incoherent rambling. Is your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black; how did you make the judgement that is what you are going to hear?
If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching.
Challenge: Skip through the intro and watch 2 full minutes. If you won't do that, your loss, I don't care.
04 Aug 20
@shavixmir said"talk about stuff everyone knows." - shavixmir
It’s a vlog with the two dullest hosts imaginable.
I can’t sot throigh 50 minutes of that listening to some rapper (and social commentator... is that seriously a thing) talk about stuff everyone knows. Who would do that to themselves?
Oh, you so did watch it after all! Thanks for watching.
04 Aug 20
@joe-shmo saidI’ve explained the basis for my judgement A) it’s a video posted by a conservative pro Trump poster and B) that poster could not summarise or highlight the guys main points for discussion.
Summarizing an hours worth of content would take me two hours ( I'm not a stenographer ). Trust me, it could not be further from incoherent rambling. Is your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black; how did you make the judgement that is what you are going to hear?
Challenge: Skip through the intro and watch 2 full minutes. If you won't do that, your loss, I don't care.
But like a true conservative poster you chose to wilfully misrepresent another poster
“ s your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black”
As mentioned above I’d already explained my stance.
I watched for ten minutes and yeah my initial fears of “rambling” and “incoherent” were realised.
I got ten minutes of a guy raised in Saudi giving a conservative hack on the usual subjects from “black women” through George Soros to “Bernie Sanders”.
Again if you think this tosh has any salient points of merit why don’t you extract them. I think the answer is that all you’d end up with is the Conservative right wing dog whistles that have been posted on these and other forums a thousand times.
04 Aug 20
@kevcvs57 said😢
I’ve explained the basis for my judgement A) it’s a video posted by a conservative pro Trump poster and B) that poster could not summarise or highlight the guys main points for discussion.
But like a true conservative poster you chose to wilfully misrepresent another poster
“ s your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black” ...[text shortened]... servative right wing dog whistles that have been posted on these and other forums a thousand times.
04 Aug 20
@kevcvs57 said"I got ten minutes of a guy raised in Saudi"
I’ve explained the basis for my judgement A) it’s a video posted by a conservative pro Trump poster and B) that poster could not summarise or highlight the guys main points for discussion.
But like a true conservative poster you chose to wilfully misrepresent another poster
“ s your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black” ...[text shortened]... servative right wing dog whistles that have been posted on these and other forums a thousand times.
Correction a Nigerian, lived in Suadi ( Now lives in UK ) Educated at Oxford. Incoherent rambling my arse!
@kevcvs57 said"As mentioned above I’d already explained my stance."
I’ve explained the basis for my judgement A) it’s a video posted by a conservative pro Trump poster and B) that poster could not summarise or highlight the guys main points for discussion.
But like a true conservative poster you chose to wilfully misrepresent another poster
“ s your default position about him having "incoherent speech" based on the fact that he is Black” ...[text shortened]... servative right wing dog whistles that have been posted on these and other forums a thousand times.
No you haven't!
Where in this thread have you "clarified" how you pre-judged his speech to be incoherent rambling?
"If the commentary in the video is so rambling and incoherent that you cannot summarise it for debate purposes and offer it as evidence then it’s probably not worth watching." kevcvs57 - You had not watched it at the point of this reply, so how did you make that judgement?
04 Aug 20
@joe-shmo saidArticulate and funny guy. He said at one point, "Yeah, I'm still black", as he
The Problem with Black Lives Matter.
A soft spoken, extremely well composed rational voice in a world going off the rails
[youtube]-Sk4-p_0pcU[/youtube]
examined his arms, "But I'll have to check with Joe Biden" - or something like that
[thumbs-up] 😆