“We’re going to bring them back to the stone ages where they belong”

@mike69 said
Why don’t you go ahead and tell me what I’m wrong about, he just seems to keep rambling on not debating anything.

Everything.

If you actually had a real brain, one not covered in Trump lies, you'd know.

@AverageJoe1 said
Will the next president get rid of the Abraham accords? You did say that he had never done anything right, so do we keep the Abraham accords as good ,or get rid of them as bad ?thank you very much.

(Don’t get conflicted now)

I'd be happy with a President who wasn't a convicted criminal. That would be a great change from what they have now. I am hoping after all this is over they go after Trump for starting an illegal war!!!

-VR

@mike69 said
Does that mean your country is actually going step up and do your part? Many years ago you spent 3.4% and had a much larger, better military. Time will tell how well you can now protect yourself letting your military fall. What was ground forces in 2026 73k you sent 140k to Iraq. You can’t even fill your ships with trained navy at only 20k, planes needing repair, ships, subs, and on but just keep chanting free Palestine and save Iran their innocent.

You're not listening.

@mike69 said
Prove me wrong

In fairness Mike you prove yourself wrong every time you post something.

@AverageJoe1 said
Then why build nukes? You would agree that they are madmen, if for no other reason than murdering 40,000 of their citizens last month. So what is the madman gonna do with a warehouse full of nukes?

Give me some of your paranoia😆😆
Pacifist fairy paranoia. Oh I forgot, do you think that bombing Hiroshima was a good idea? It killed 100,000 people, including children.

They don't have any "nukes" which is a colloquial term for nuclear weapons.

They do have uranium which can and is used in civilian nuclear power programs.

The US, EU and others signed an agreement with Iran back in 2015 which required regular inspections of their facilities by international agencies to ensure they weren't attempting to obtain "nukes". Unhappily, some idiot ended the agreement back in 2018. Still, US intelligence agencies said that Iran couldn't build a nuke for at least 10 years even if they were trying to and there were negotiations ongoing for another agreement (the mediator we agreed to said they were close to a mutually acceptable treaty). Unhappily, some idiot decided to attack Iran for the second time in less than a year while there were ongoing negotiations.

How much of that were you aware of?

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Special Forces (SAS/SBS): The UK's Special Air Service (SAS) and Special Boat Service (SBS) are widely considered among the best trained and most experienced special forces in the world. They are often regarded as the pioneers in elite tactical operations and frequently train US special forces, including Delta Force and Navy SEALs.

Even American SEALs know that the SAS is no joke.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
In fairness Mike you prove yourself wrong every time you post something.

Look another little sue

@mike69 said
Look another little sue

Why do you crumble so easily in a debate? Is it a republican thing?

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
In fairness Mike you prove yourself wrong every time you post something.

I told him that pages ago, but he doesn't listen.

-VR

@Suzianne said
Even American SEALs know that the SAS is no joke.

As of 2026, the U.S. Army's Delta Force (1st SFOD-D) and the British Special Air Service (SAS) remain top-tier, interoperable special operations units. Delta is better resourced, focusing on high-tech counterterrorism and direct action, while the SAS, with a historical reputation for operating with minimal resources, excels in high-stakes, unconventional, and small-team tactics.
Comparison and Similarities
Relationship: They maintain close bonds and exchange programs, often conducting joint training.
Roles: Both specialize in direct action, hostage rescue, and counterterrorism.
Recruitment: Both have incredibly rigorous selection processes, with Delta typically drawing from Army Rangers/Green Berets and SAS drawing from the UK armed forces, particularly the Parachute Regiment.
Size: Delta is estimated to have ~1,000 operators, while the SAS is smaller, with roughly 400–600 personnel.

@Very-Rusty said
I told him that pages ago, but he doesn't listen.

-VR

Jump on what I’ve typed superstar.

@Ghost-of-a-Duke said
Why do you crumble so easily in a debate? Is it a republican thing?

I’ve answered to every statement you’ve made to me here you just keep running in the face of truth. You would think a big smart man like you can refute what I’ve been saying instead of dodging answering nothing.

@no1marauder said
They don't have any "nukes" which is a colloquial term for nuclear weapons.

They do have uranium which can and is used in civilian nuclear power programs.

The US, EU and others signed an agreement with Iran back in 2015 which required regular inspections of their facilities by international agencies to ensure they weren't attempting to obtain "nukes". Unhappily, s ...[text shortened]... e in less than a year while there were ongoing negotiations.

How much of that were you aware of?

Here is CoPilot on this issue :

*********************************
Question Evidence‑based answer
- Did Iran ever pursue nuclear weapons? Yes (documented up to 2003)
- Was this programme covert and non‑compliant with the NPT? Yes
- Did Iran halt structured weaponization? Yes (around 2003)
- Is Iran currently building a nuclear bomb? No proven evidence
- Is Iran positioning itself to be able to build one? Yes

✅ Bottom Line - There is definitive proof that Iran pursued a nuclear weapons programme in the past, including weaponization research and undeclared nuclear activities. There is no verified proof that Iran is currently running an active, structured nuclear weapons programme, according to the IAEA and U.S. intelligence. Iran’s current conduct keeps the weapons option viable, which is why it remains a major international concern.

*********************************

@Rajk999 said
Here is CoPilot on this issue :

*********************************
Question Evidence‑based answer
- Did Iran ever pursue nuclear weapons? Yes (documented up to 2003)
- Was this programme covert and non‑compliant with the NPT? Yes
- Did Iran halt structured weaponization? Yes (around 2003)
- Is Iran currently building a nuclear bomb? No proven evidence
- Is ...[text shortened]... viable, which is why it remains a major international concern.

*********************************

We've already used the "they have weapons of mass destruction" excuse once to invade a country. Turned out they didn't.

What's that definition of insanity again?

@Suzianne said
Everything.

If you actually had a real brain, one not covered in Trump lies, you'd know.

Come on fool what am I wrong about. Do I need to type one question at a time to you and we go over and settle things slowly for you? I don’t mind if it would help you, do you also need visual aids?