@mike69 saidBest Mike post ever.
As of 2026, the U.S. Army's Delta Force (1st SFOD-D) and the British Special Air Service (SAS) remain top-tier, interoperable special operations units. Delta is better resourced, focusing on high-tech counterterrorism and direct action, while the SAS, with a historical reputation for operating with minimal resources, excels in high-stakes, unconventional, and small-team tactic ...[text shortened]... lta is estimated to have ~1,000 operators, while the SAS is smaller, with roughly 400–600 personnel.
Not a single lie. I hope it didn't hurt.
@Rajk999 saidThose without any kind of intelligence depend too heavily on AI.
Here is CoPilot on this issue :
*********************************
Question Evidence‑based answer
- Did Iran ever pursue nuclear weapons? Yes (documented up to 2003)
- Was this programme covert and non‑compliant with the NPT? Yes
- Did Iran halt structured weaponization? Yes (around 2003)
- Is Iran currently building a nuclear bomb? No proven evidence
- Is ...[text shortened]... viable, which is why it remains a major international concern.
*********************************
I guess they have no choice, really.
More to this post:
Of course Iran went back to nuclear weapons after Trump gave them the brightest green light ever, by pulling out of Obama's deal (JPCOA) with them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_withdrawal_from_the_Iran_nuclear_deal
@no1marauder saidIraq under Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapon ambitions. Whether or not IAEA inspectors found anything is not relevant. In 1981 Israel bombed a nuclear facility in Osirak. Subsequently Saddam continued to stockpile uranium far more than what was necessary for peaceful use. Syria had similar ambitions and Israel removed that as well. Iran tried the same thing and it was bombed recently.
We've already used the "they have weapons of mass destruction" excuse once to invade a country. Turned out they didn't.
What's that definition of insanity again?
Nobody takes any chances with these Islamic animals. They lie and cheat and deceive to achieve their goals of killing Jews, Christians and unbelievers. The more of them are killed the better the world will be.
1 edit
@Rajk999 said"Whether or not IAEA inspectors found anything is not relevant."
Iraq under Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapon ambitions. Whether or not IAEA inspectors found anything is not relevant. In 1981 Israel bombed a nuclear facility in Osirak. Subsequently Saddam continued to stockpile uranium far more than what was necessary for peaceful use. Syria had similar ambitions and Israel removed that as well. Iran tried the same thing and it was bomb ...[text shortened]... killing Jews, Christians and unbelievers. The more of them are killed the better the world will be.
Really??
1 edit
@Suzianne saidAnother ignorant comment by a fool, It was from something I watched last night and you called me a little boy, they have parents.brought it to mind. Don’t you get tired of making pointless stupid comments out of thin air?
I will tell you one more time only.
Do not insult my father. He was a far better man than you.
I took off the last part, I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. This is the deal, don’t threaten and insult me if you don’t want pushed back on, and don’t try playing a victim card again for forum gain.
@Suzianne saidWayne stopped range wars. Clint Eastwood stopped wars. Donald Trump has stopped seven of them so far he is about to stop this one. They will be peace in the Middle East.
"Pacifist fairy paranoia."
We've got nothing on you Trumpublicans. You prefer war-mongering paranoia? You're raised on it from an early age. Everyone wants to be John Wayne.