2 Blonde genies

Originally posted by dottewell
That's quite irrelevant as to whether she is right or wrong about you.

It might be more relevant than you think. What do you think it is?

Originally posted by Red Night
It might be more relevant than you think. What do you think it is?

Either she's wrong about you, or she's right. It doesn't matter who she is, or what she is.

Originally posted by Red Night
It might be more relevant than you think. What do you think it is?

i woul'd refer it to you,piffling, pinheaded, pedantic, flibbertigibbet of a little man,. That spelling good enough for you?

Originally posted by dottewell
Either she's wrong about you, or she's right. It doesn't matter who she is, or what she is.

Didn't really answer the question.

“Who you are speaks so loudly I can't hear what you're saying.” Emerson

It's unlikely that she is either right or wrong, since in reality she is doing little more than spouting popular, contemporary, pseudo-intellectual, psycho-babble in the form of an insult.

AND, the quote comes from her own profile. So to insult me for being insulting and for being prying conjures up images of black pots under the circumstances.

Originally posted by dizzymc
i woul'd refer it to you,piffling, pinheaded, pedantic, flibbertigibbet of a little man,. That spelling good enough for you?

Yes, good job. You're spelling is getting much better!

Originally posted by Red Night
Yes, good job. You're spelling is getting much better!

Pot, you might want to check your grammar...

Originally posted by eagles54
Pot, you might want to check your grammar...

I don't think it's a grammar issue, but you are correct.

Originally posted by Red Night
I don't think it's a grammar issue, but you are correct.

My mistake.

Originally posted by Red Night
I don't think it's a grammar issue, but you are correct.

...and I thought it was a feeble attempt at being clever. I guess I overestimated you.

Originally posted by eagles54
My mistake.

No you were correct. It's pot's calling kettle's black. And thanks, I corrected it on the original post.

Originally posted by rbmorris
...and I thought it was a feeble attempt at being clever. I guess I overestimated you.

Actually, I think I was subconsciously trying to avoid pot jokes.

But, don't feel bad. You're certainly not the first person to be mistaken for thinking that I said something clever.

Originally posted by Red Night
It's unlikely that she is either right or wrong, since in reality she is doing little more than spouting popular, contemporary, pseudo-intellectual, psycho-babble in the form of an insult.

At least this addresses the point. You are saying what she said was meaningless? It doesn't appear meaningless. A lot of people seem to understand what she is saying, and agree.

Originally posted by dottewell
At least this addresses the point. You are saying what she said was meaningless? It doesn't appear meaningless. A lot of people seem to understand what she is saying, and agree.

The fact that people agree or disagree with a statement doesn't make that statement necessarily true or false.

If the statement has meaning for you, that's great. Build a belief structure around it, if you like.

To me it was nothing more than an attempt at an insult.