Originally posted by kevcvs57Is there a question there. I, mean?
So basically you want to scare fellow posters into not giving your threads a thumbs down, the label of coward implies that there is something to be afraid of.
The whole point of a voting system, of which the thumbs button is rudimentary example, is that the views of the voters are expressed without fear of adverse repercussions. The best way to ensure th ...[text shortened]... ay to deal with the systematic and therefor meaningless use of the thumb option is to ignore it.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou think people who give your posts 'thumbs down' are "belligerent cowards"?
(updates and a second boot took, I hope) Unintentionally, FM. Am trying to reach you but the waves seem to be experiencing static. Here goes. Deterrent's the key. An awareness of butt nakedness would cause even the most belligerent coward to pause and thimk at least once in the life of any given thread. The pent up Pentium Energy must go somewhere. So, ...[text shortened]... replies might enhance the forum experience for those in need of a social fix or larf.[/ink]
.
Originally posted by kevcvs57How do you scare ANYONE on the interwebz???
So basically you want to scare fellow posters into not giving your threads a thumbs down, the label of coward implies that there is something to be afraid of.
The whole point of a voting system, of which the thumbs button is rudimentary example, is that the views of the voters are expressed without fear of adverse repercussions. The best way to ensure th ...[text shortened]... ay to deal with the systematic and therefor meaningless use of the thumb option is to ignore it.
That would be a good trick..>>ROFLMAO<<
Originally posted by Very RustyThen how can anyone be a coward, and consequently how could making them divulge their identity effect the number of thumb downs that they issue.
How do you scare ANYONE on the interwebz???
That would be a good trick..>>ROFLMAO<<
Try to keep your argument internally consistent.
Ps ROFLYAO was probably an over reaction.
Originally posted by kevcvs57"So basically you want to scare fellow posters..." No, not at all... neither the fellows nor the girls.
So basically you want to scare fellow posters into not giving your threads a thumbs down, the label of coward implies that there is something to be afraid of.
The whole point of a voting system, of which the thumbs button is rudimentary example, is that the views of the voters are expressed without fear of adverse repercussions. The best way to ens ...[text shortened]... st way to deal with the systematic and therefor meaningless use of the thumb option is to ignore it.
Just let them be themselves and function within the system we have (until the day it's improved).
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyI am just responding to a post you addressed to me. You used the term "belligerent cowards". Is that how you characterize people who are unimpressed by you and click on 'thumbs down'?
Let's let other members spin their records for awhile. (thank you)
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyHonest chess?????
Also, Like: Affordability with Honest Chess, Friendship Opportunities and Pleasant Distraction Benefits.
Have you not seen some of those postings in the clan forum?
Or the clown forum as I like to call it.
Those guys in there don't think there is honest chess going on.