1 edit
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveYou're welcome.
You sure????
User 187315
D
[Edit] Obviously labelled incorrectly.
2 edits
Originally posted by PhlabibitThat illustrates what is known as padding. Padding is not necessarily one player with multi accounts playing one against the other. It can also be two friends playing bogus games, to increase the rating of one player. TOS does not say you have to win, and such a rule is unenforceable.
http://www.timeforchess.com/core/viewpublicgames.php?p1name=xlacir&p2name=Distrbd&showgamescode=A&isminiboard=on&Search=Search
Feel the burn!
P-
Calling this record a 3(b) is a good intrepetation of TOS (IMO)
As player A may have told player B to lose, therefore player B has taken outside advise.
But 3(a) could also work, as one player is basically playing both sides. 😕
Originally posted by Dr Strangelovehttp://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=56439&page=5#post_1059305
You sure????
User 187315
D
1 edit
Originally posted by RagnorakMy guess is these 2 told Russ they play from the same computer...
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=56439&page=5#post_1059305
D
and perhaps one guy was logged in when the other guy responded
to that post.
Since 2 or more CAN play from the same computer, he had to go
with 3b since he's taken them at their word they ARE 2 separate
people.
If it was 3a... one or both of them would complain and cry cuz
they are 2 people (True or not).
So, if they are 2 people... one of them is throwing games for the
other guy... and now they are removed for inflating their rating.
P-
Originally posted by RagnorakThat doesn't seem that incriminating - you could easily read that as the poster revising his own statement about losing his faith, and chose to quote his own post to highlight which statement he was trying to correct. He then goes on to to continue his discussion with Hand of Hecate, forgetting that there would be confusion as to who he was talking to.
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=56439&page=5#post_1059305
D
Originally posted by HindsteinEh? It wasn't supposed to be incriminating. It was supposed to be funny. 😞
That doesn't seem that incriminating - you could easily read that as the poster revising his own statement about losing his faith, and chose to quote his own post to highlight which statement he was trying to correct. He then goes on to to continue his discussion with Hand of Hecate, forgetting that there would be confusion as to who he was talking to.
D
Originally posted by skeeterI'd love to share a passionate moment with you in private. A little French kiss. A little touchy-touchy. Running my fingers through your thin, black hair. Probing for your non-existent upper lip with my eager tongue...
You tell 'im Phlabby. That knobby has way too mouth around here.
...was that fries with the order...???.....Sir??
skeeter