Originally posted by SuzianneIt hasn't eluded me at all. It was the very thing that meant you were abusing the web site's message facility and which meant that you earned and deserved no "trust" and you were not owed any duty of cooperation in keeping your behaviour secret. Your own "real people" credentials would be enhanced if you'd at least acknowledge that this whole thing was caused by your relentlessly nasty anger and your abuse of the facility provided by RHP.
It was ONE throwaway line in an entire post, the purpose of which seems to elude both you and him.
Originally posted by SuzianneThis again. This again. And yet it is you who is the almost unfathomably un-self-aware and permanently furious headless chicken at the very centre of this incident.
So excuse me for not cutting you any slack on this one. You and he need a course on empathy and actually understanding people.
-Removed-Since this reiterative vomit is the only thing you keep spewing out, as if it actually means something, I feel I must respond, if only to eliminate this twaddle from the discussion.
I've already explained what the PM is and what it was about. Both you and he have shamelessly used one sentence from it to weakly pursue your questionable agenda and narrative against me and others, while ignoring the actual content of the PM.
Apparently the only reason you and he decided to latch onto this weak argument is to attack me yet again. Wow, talk about not getting the ENTIRE point of the PM.
It was hardly a threat, but you and he continue to harp on the supposed ABUSE in the PM, while ignoring your own ABUSE of forum users for years. And you dare to call me 'hypocritical'.
-Removed-What does it have to do with the discussion??? More of the same from you. Ignoring the entire point of the PM to further your own questionable narrative.
If you're going to keep ignoring people in these forums because you don't, or can't, get their point because you can't be bothered to see their side even for a millisecond, then you cannot seriously expect anyone to keep listening to you.
-Removed-You not only missed the point then, you totally ignored it to further your agenda and deliver unsubstantiated blows on me.
And you're doing the same thing now. Some things never change.
You have never shown any aptitude for empathy in these forums. Oh, you're okay with people... up to the point when they start disagreeing with you and suddenly you feel personally attacked and then you launch your agenda to destroy these people in the forums. First it was Grampy Bobby, now we're seeing the same thing once again.
Just admit you don't care about anything anyone says if it's not about you, okay? Then we can all move on, ignoring you as we should.
Originally posted by SuzianneI can see your side. So what? You think my supposed lack of "empathy" and me not being one of the "real people" [or not knowing what "real people" are, or whatever your daft little riff is], means that it was OK for you to abuse RHP's message system. I can see your side. So...?
If you're going to keep ignoring people in these forums because you don't, or can't, get their point because you can't be bothered to see their side even for a millisecond, then you cannot seriously expect anyone to keep listening to you.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeLike I said, I mis-read it. But it is just the same as the kid who was suspended from school for using his fingers shaped like a gun, the little criminal, next thing you know he will show up at school with an AK47. Come on, get serious. There is no real threat there, she did not say, I know where you live and am coming after you with my 38. You are taking PC to really stupid dimensions.
So are you retracting your 'pre-qualifier' argument?
'If you ever come near me,....I will hurt you,' Would indeed validate the idea of a justified pre-qualifier to the threat.
However, 'and if I am ever unfortunate enough to meet you,...I will hurt you,' can't really be viewed in the same manner.
Originally posted by FMFI know this may come as a complete shock to you, and you may even consider it a non sequitur, but you calling it "abuse" does not make it "abuse". Certainly neither the web site, nor the owners of said website, considers it abuse. Grow up and realize that just because someone says something to you in response to YOUR abuse over years, doesn't automagically make that abuse.
Nothing "compelled" Suzianne to abuse the web site's message facility. Nothing "compelled" me to not block her and to leave the door open to her to use the same facility with more decency in future. Nothing "compelled" sonhouse and chaney3 to make fools of themselves with their bizarre name calling. Nothing compelled you to try your "compelled" catchphrase/buzzword umpteen times in the last 48 hours when it's just meaningless repetition of a dud idea. 😉
Originally posted by SuzianneDo you only have this one string in your self-aggrandizing bow? "Empathy". You're sounding like robbie, juggling just one little buzz word, incessantly, ineffectively, self-defeatingly.
You have never shown any aptitude for empathy in these forums.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou believe that the message that Handy Andy reproduced earlier on this thread was not an abuse of the RHP web site facility and that I had a duty to keep it secret? Are you sure?
I know this may come as a complete shock to you, and you may even consider it a non sequitur, but you calling it "abuse" does not make it "abuse". Certainly neither the web site, nor the owners of said website, considers it abuse. Grow up and realize that just because someone says something to you in response to YOUR abuse over years, doesn't automagically make that abuse.
Originally posted by sonhouseMy PC frequently goes to stupid dimensions.
Like I said, I mis-read it. But it is just the same as the kid who was suspended from school for using his fingers shaped like a gun, the little criminal, next thing you know he will show up at school with an AK47. Come on, get serious. There is no real threat there, she did not say, I know where you live and am coming after you with my 38. You are taking PC to really stupid dimensions.
I'm signed up to Facebook.
😞
-Removed-And the website reserves its 'freedom of choice' to reprimand you for that.
And what, exactly, do you consider "a PM like that"??
A conciliatory concession message, designed to try to stem the flow of real abuse?
You mean like that?
What you mean to say, is any PM that YOU deem to be "saying things I don't want to hear".
So all I hear you saying is that you will post publicly any PM sent to you that you don't like.
Cool, enjoy yourself. But please, realize you also have to accept the consequences of your actions.
Originally posted by SuzianneI don't think anyone is ignoring the content of your message at all. What makes you think that? I myself have acknowledged that it contained paranoid theories and accusations that I would have kept confidential and I probably would have replied to you if you hadn't blocked me and threatened to report me for "harassment" if I found a way to get my reply to you.
I've already explained what the PM is and what it was about. Both you and he have shamelessly used one sentence from it to weakly pursue your questionable agenda and narrative against me and others, while ignoring the actual content of the PM.
Tell me, did you include the last contentious section of the message deliberately? Did you tell yourself, ha ha, I'm going to say this thing and he'll have no choice but to keep it secret ~ did you calculate it in some way like that?
Originally posted by SuzianneDo you have any examples of this "flow of real abuse" that in some way exceeds the stuff you dish out? To not be seen as a complete and utter hypocrite in all this, you ought to cite some examples of the "flow of real abuse" that you're on about.
A conciliatory concession message, designed to try to stem the flow of real abuse?