Go back
@Suzianne

@Suzianne

General


Originally posted by Very Rusty
You must of missed where FMF said: he didn't in the least bit feel threatened. He said: Thought it was ludicrous and laughable.
That's right [1] I didn't in the least bit feel threatened, [2] I thought it was ludicrous and laughable and [3] there was absolutely no onus on me to keep a message like that secret [4] I showed it to people.

If Suzianne is embarrassed or humiliated by what she said, she shouldn't have typed the words out and sent them to me using the RHP message facility. She might be able to rely on you or chaney3 to keep her ludicrous and laughable secret, but it's silly for her to think that such an obligation applies to anyone she's aiming her preposterous accusations and threats at.


Originally posted by chaney3
Good......because considering the fact that FMF did not feel thteatened at all by Suzianne's remark, and that everyone agrees her PM was not abusive, but heartfelt and sincere...
There was no obligation to keep a "heartfelt and sincere" message like that confidential. That is the only point here. All the name calling and pathetic tough talk from her admirers is neither here nor there. She had the right to send me her "heartfelt and sincere" words and I had the right to show them to whoever I wanted to.


Originally posted by josephw
Geez dive, wouldn't you rather that Suzianne was defended by "some tough talking Internet men" than vilified by a couple of mealy mouthing Internet pansies? 😉
I thought you said you were against these kinds of posts, no?


Originally posted by FMF
That's right [1] I didn't in the least bit feel threatened, [2] I thought it was ludicrous and laughable and [3] there was absolutely no onus on me to keep a message like that secret [4] I showed it to people.

If Suzianne is embarrassed or humiliated by what she said, she shouldn't have typed the words out and sent them to me using the RHP message facility. S ...[text shortened]... t such an obligation applies to anyone she's aiming her preposterous accusations and threats at.
This post of yours is as stupid as it gets!!

Based on your points 1 & 2, there was NO basis to share her PM.

The 'onus' is to keep a PM secret.

But, it is obvious that you will deny, deny, deny.....because you have proven to be a pansy, as noted by myself and most others on this thread.


Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I miss the days when people use to say 'kerfuffle.'

Things were much simpler back then. Tank tops were all the rage and a crisp one pound note could bribe a lazy sister into cleaning the rabbit hutch.
I still occasionally wear the tank top in the summer.

Heck, now that I think about it, there seems to be plenty of mullets still around on the west side, too. 🙂


Originally posted by chaney3
FMF has admitted on this thread that Suzianne's so called 'one sentence threat' was considered to him, silly and laughable, and not a threat at all. So the threat issue is not an issue at all.
The issue is whether she retained any right to keep her laughable words secret.


Originally posted by FMF
The issue is whether she retained any right to keep her laughable words secret.
Issue solved:

It was a PM.

What the hell is your problem?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Actual fighting, street fighting, is brutal and savage. Sport fighting, with rules, at least has some semblance of civility balanced with respect. Fun to watch, but painful to experience.

That "mixed martial arts" fighting is the closest thing to brutal and savage as it gets in my opinion. Painful to watch. 😕
Street fighting sends people to the hospital. The idea is to disable them from wanting to keep trying to pound you. Broken limbs, dislocated joints, that kind of thing. "Sport fighting", with rules, is nothing like that, even though accidents do happen. Even martial arts tournaments are designed to keep people from being unnecessarily hurt.


You guys know that some prisons have internet access, right?


Originally posted by Suzianne
I still occasionally wear the tank top in the summer.

My 15 year-old foster son has just bought a tank top (with a hood!) so I guess they are back?

Fashion Lesson 1: Never throw anything away!


Originally posted by chaney3
Issue solved:

It was a PM.

What the hell is your problem?
I don't have any problem at all. I showed it to my friends. I let Suzianne know that I had. The problem with all this seems to be yours.


-Removed-
Forum attacks usually are personal. People get upset by people who target them for abuse. There seem to be very few that do it "for the lulz" anymore. Rottweilers don't do it "for the lulz" either. It's often the ones who SAY they do it "for the lulz" who are the most vicious. If that's how you get your "lulz", I'm glad I don't know you.

Do you go around attacking your "friends" in the forum, or only people who disagree with you?

Oh, wait, you said you don't have any forum friends. So it's only people who don't agree with you? But we knew that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
My 15 year-old foster son has just bought a tank top (with a hood!) so I guess they are back?

Fashion Lesson 1: Never throw anything away!
Tank top with a hood?

Sure it isn't just a sleeveless hoodie?


-Removed-
You have no idea how I feel.

Even after I tell you several times.


Originally posted by Suzianne
Forum attacks usually are personal.
You launch ridiculous and laughable attacks all the time. I have never alerted any of them. Everyone can read them. If you send me messages that include ridiculous and laughable attacks then people other than me will read them ~ maybe not "everyone" ~ unless you authorize them to be published on the forum, as you did in this case. You should continue to launch whatever ridiculous and laughable attacks you want to on the forum if that's what you feel the need to do. I support your right to free speech. I haven't blocked your messages.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.