31 Jul 16
Originally posted by josephwThis is what. Earlier you were complaining about a lack of truth, about people churning out repetitive rubbish and bunging up the forum with it (my paraphrasing) - and here you are saying absolutely nothing to them about their pages and pages of forum-bunging nonsense about the Moderator/Russ thing (which you acknowledge as being untrue) but instead you're complaining to me about it. What principle are you exercising as you conduct yourself in this way?
No, but I hardly endorse yours either. What does that have to do with anything?
Originally posted by FMFI'm not responsible for what Rusty posts, nor am I inclined to repudiate him for every little thing he says I don't agree with. I pick and choose what I see fit to discuss and with whom I choose to discuss it with.
But you haven't "just ignored it", have you, josephw. Very Rusty has mentioned the Moderator thing about 30 times and he's mentioned the Russ thing another 30 times, and on maybe 20 of those occasions he mentioned them both - and you said nothing. And when I mentioned it [b]once to robbie in a lighthearted way, you immediately tackled me on it. It is most peculiar. Have you read any of Very Rusty's posts on this thread? π[/b]
Don't blame me for the flak you're getting from others. π
Originally posted by FMFHey! It was just one post I made commenting on the anomaly. Why do we have to discuss it any further? What's the big deal? How much time and space are we going to devote to something so innocuous?
In that case I suggest you take it to Site Ideas and tell them you reckon that it's only me it happens to.
I gotta get up and get moving before my old back stiffens up. Later.
Originally posted by josephwSo let's get this straight. You choose not to confront people like Suzianne and Very Rusty about them churning out repetitive untrue rubbish and bunging up the forum with it, and you are not prepared to unequivocally hold them responsible for it, but you do choose to complain about all that stuff and its effect on the forum to me and you do unequivocally hold me partly responsible for it? Once again, what principle do you believe yourself to be exercising when you conduct yourself in this way?
I'm not responsible for what Rusty posts, nor am I inclined to repudiate him for every little thing he says I don't agree with. I pick and choose what I see fit to discuss and with whom I choose to discuss it with.
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by josephwI was just trying to help, josephw, that's all.
Hey! It was just one post I made commenting on the anomaly. Why do we have to discuss it any further? What's the big deal? How much time and space are we going to devote to something so innocuous?
31 Jul 16
FMF: So what is it you are accusing me of defending? And why not offer an example of when I defended whatever it was? I don't get why you are being so furtive.I don't see how this reply answers the question. Did you forget to type some more sentences? What is it you are accusing me of defending? And why not offer an example of when I defended whatever it was?
Originally posted by josephw
I'm not being furtive. Nice word "furtive", but it underscores your methodology because it misrepresent intent. Can't you see how you do that?
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis seems to be your entire repartee in one post.
Is there not a button one can push to get rid of you? oh wait, the FMF away button,
goodbye to mundane dullardly and inquisitorial finger pointing, goodbye to stiff old Nurse Ratched of RHP, goodbye to the knife wielding grammar prig and edit counter, goodbye to the gossping real housewife of RHP, goodbye to gay John Noakes and divegeester the l ...[text shortened]... f the Zombie apocalypse, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye.
divegeester the lapdog, lol that funny π