Go back
A PK Speech

A PK Speech

General

1 edit

Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. Again, as I mentioned in other threads, I'm appalled by the mockery many have made of this. And those of you who abused this even got a familiar name calling for the banishment of recs completely again. He is a friend of mine here so I would not say anything against him. But the goal was the opposite of this.

Those of you who supported this from the beginning, I'd shake your hand, but this is the internet. Be patient, the idiots will run out soon. And suprisingly, it's even some of the people who supported the idea that are now ruining it. Shame on you guys.

To the idiots: grow the hell up! If I were Russ, I would take a few hours and banish you fools with a big smile on my face.

Granted, the rec system is not something that can be policed, nor should it need to be. But it's like being in kindergarten, a few absolute IDIOTS ruin it for everyone else, and things you once had get taken away. That my friends, kills the forums. And you whine and complain when the forums are down.

I'm not saying don't use your recs. Use your recs, use them well, and it can be a pleasant and enjoyable experience for all. And the recommended page can be filled with good stuff. And I'm all for the occasional great insult or joke being rec'd, but not the catastrophe of what people have done these past 2 days.

Two more points:

Only you can prevent forest fires

and

wrap it every time


Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK


Originally posted by PocketKings
Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. A ...[text shortened]...

Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK
😉 rec'd


Originally posted by pawnfondler
😉 rec'd
Only if its worth the rec 😉 This really should work if treated right


Originally posted by PocketKings
Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. A ...[text shortened]...

Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK
That's just really cute.


Originally posted by Sunburnt
That's just really cute.
thanks


Originally posted by PocketKings
Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. A ...[text shortened]...

Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK
So you are now saying that the people who have recced posts that you do not find reccable are wrecking the rec system?

How do you decide if a post is reccable or not?

If a post gets a rec from 6 people does that necessarily make it a good post?

If a post only gets one rec does that make it a good post, a bad post or just a post that someone finds worthy of reccing?

i.e. Thread 99396 the post by Daemon Sin was, IMO, funny but yet only received 2 recs.

However in Thread 99564 a boring post, IMO, by greenpawn34 was also deemed worthy of 2 recs.

Let people rec to their hearts delight. Eventually people will calm down their reccing frenzy.


Originally posted by adramforall
So you are now saying that the people who have recced posts that you do not find reccable are wrecking the rec system?

How do you decide if a post is reccable or not?

If a post gets a rec from 6 people does that necessarily make it a good post?

If a post only gets one rec does that make it a good post, a bad post or just a post that someone find ...[text shortened]...
Let people rec to their hearts delight. Eventually people will calm down their reccing frenzy.
Don't question me, ever 😠

Use some common sense, and you'll figure out what I'm talking about.

1 edit

Originally posted by PocketKings
Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. A

Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK
Player Killers represent! We won't let you bluebies off the hook! We'll hunt you down and kill you over and over 'till you quit playing!

SANCTUS LUMEN REPRESENT! Go go good team!

Wait...oh yeah...that guild's gone...I don't play that game any more...

But at least Fansy is still entertaining to read about. For me at least.

http://www.notaddicted.com/fansythefamous.php


Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Player Killers represent! We won't let you bluebies off the hook! We'll hunt you down and kill you over and over 'till you quit playing!

SANCTUS LUMEN REPRESENT! Go go good team!

Wait...oh yeah...that guild's gone...I don't play that game any more...

But at least Fansy is still entertaining to read about. For me at least.

http://www.notaddicted.com/fansythefamous.php
You lost me somewhere in the beginning of that


Originally posted by PocketKings
Those of you who know me best know I don't do the speech, lectures or soap box stuff...well, not much anyway. My most recent rant has been a well known thread about the rec count. My goal was to reinstate the rec count, but we got more recs instead. I'm certainly happy and willing to take it, it's progress, it's a stepping stone in the right direction. A ...[text shortened]...

Thanks for your time. Please consider this with seriousness.

Sincerely,

PK
why... whatever do you mean?😕
















































































rec'd

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Vote Up
1
Vote Down


The post that was quoted here has been removed
sum people you jes' cain't help, so we gets what we got here....

1 edit

The post that was quoted here has been removed
OK, ok, I'll settle a bit, but I stand by my previous statement.




😛