Originally posted by c99uxyou just prevented this thread from becoming another gay thread.😉
Well, maybe it's a "he" because "he/she/it" comes from Brazil but only moves once a day. As far as I know, they usually move quite a lot, especially during Mardi Gras or on the football pitch...
Or "it" might be a couch potato of some kind.
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugAdd me!
Add me when you're down
Add me when you need someone
Add me when it's rough
And you think that there's no one
Add me when you're down...
Love just for the understanding
Things that love carries, what we're demanding
Listen to the heart thats beating
Forget about lust and all misleading
Love, talk about me and you
My love just makes every ...[text shortened]...
Questions lies in the heavens and ground
It's up to me and I'll add you when I'm down
On the line...
You can add me, add me, anytime.
Add me!
On the line...
You can add me any day or night.
Add me...
P-
Originally posted by c99uxSay... you are pretty good with statistics. There's a job for you somewhere's in the American government! 😲
Yeah, he's not doing so bad:
0 recs yet,
1 thread,
2 days in,
3 moves made
4 games started
5 people posted in his thread
6 degrees between him (her/it) and you...
7 posts in his thread.
You'll have to change your methods though. From reporting the facts to only reporting statistics that make the American government look good.
Originally posted by arrakisWhen we actually take a closer look at the statistics we have here, we'll see that there are a few discrepancies. Now, that could be because the facts have changed since the points of the statistics were added up, and other things have been added onto the table since then as well, so the facts are now not the same as they were when they were first stated to be true, and were, in fact, true at that time, but are not actually true now. Now, if I were to take into consideration all the changes which have occured since those first true facts and statistics were noted, and indeed posted here (at which time they were in fact correct and true representations of the actual things which had up to that point happened, and the representation of those events and facts, which were as we have already noted were true), those original statistics would now be incorrect. But if we do not take those subsequent events and facts into consideration, then the facts and statistics which I reported here could still be interpreted (rightly) as being based on actual facts which occured in the past and which were reported as they had happened. You will notice that the original post has 2 edits, which were in fact alterations required to keep the statistics up to date when the data was originally posted. The original post was like this:
Say... you are pretty good with statistics. There's a job for you somewhere's in the American government! 😲
You'll have to change your methods though. From reporting the facts to only reporting statistics that make the American government look good.
Yeah, he's not doing so bad:
0 recs yet,
1 thread,
2 days in,
3 moves made
4 games started
5 posts in his thread
These facts and statistics were altered later, in fact in an edit by the author (me, c99ux), in attempt to keep the statistics up to date and factual and correct at all times. The first edit was for the inclusion of the 6 degrees between between him (her/it) and you... ; the second edit was for the cahnge of the 5th and 7th points, because the facts by that time had changed the situation so that the statistics did not in fact represent true facts, and so had to be changed to keep the post true, factual and correct. The 5th point was changed to include the total number of different persons who had posted in the thread up to that time, and the 7th point was the upgrade of the actual number of post in the thread whichhad infact actually increased from the original 5 to 7.
I gave up editing the post after the first 3 changes occured because otherwise I would have had to keep editing the original post permanently, everytime another post was added, or another rec (if indeed one was; the subject of these statistics has still only 1 rec, for example); or another move was made, or another game started, won, drawn, lost, resigned or deleted. Some of these were not even mentioned in the original statistics, and knowing that there would be such circumstances in the future, the author of the first and original statistical post (me, c99ux) decided not to continue adding new facts and statistics as and when they occured; also to stop editing the original post every time some additional facts or statistics rendered the original post infactual or incorrect.
At the time of posting, the original facts and statistics were truthfully, honestly and factually represented, and at the times when the two edits were carried out, the facts were also truthfully, honestly and factually represented. Thus we can conclude that the facts and statistics presented were in fact true and actual representations of the number certain incidents had happened.
Now the bit which makes the US government look good:
...so you see, sometimes, things are correct and factual at one time, but later they're just not true. If Dick Chainey shoots his gun at his friend today, will it still be smoking next week? NO. Let me say that again: No. NO, of course it won't. So, just as there were in fact WsMD there, they ain't there now, so we were right at that time and we're still right now, and no one is going to prove us wrong just because things change.
And that's what I told you all that time ago when it was true. OK?
EDIT 1,2&3: Just checking the facts and updating the statistics.