23 Jul 08
Originally posted by mazattacka shark would only bite once, then spit. a lion would swallow. -it all depends on whether you prefer the one eating you to spit or swallow.
Actually, wouldnt a lion bite your neck, killing you quickly, whereas you would slowly drown while being torn apart with a shark.
The moral? Stay indoors.
I'll get me coat.
23 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by nihilismorNeither, although I've ordered both (on different occasions with clients) as entrees during visits to a three star wild game gourmet restaurant
Would you rather be eaten alive by a lion or a shark?
in Chicago years ago. Lion Filet with a Shallot and Grand Marnier reduction was superior to the shark and boar. And didn't taste like chicken.
Clarence
}😀
24 Jul 08
1 edit
I have given the matter some thought and decided the shark.
Reason being, the lion would not care if you werent totally dead - just incapacitated- so would eat regardless of your conscious state.
Secondly - they prefer to start at the stomach and work outwards, so it would last a while.
The shark, while having less concern of incapacitating its prey, will tend to rip off very large chunks of flesh with every bite so you would die of blood loss (rumoured to be quite a pleasent death) before he was finished eating.
