Originally posted by geniusBritain does not have a written constitution - there are no written rights of kings and queens. Parliament, as the mandate of the prople has the right to choose its king, as James II found out in 1688, or George III during the regency.
but what right does william have to the throne before his father???
If Charles had a devine right to be king, we as the people of Britain would not have a right to abolish the king.
Andrew
Originally posted by latex bishopI thought divine rights belonged to the Divine. Kirk
Britain does not have a written constitution - there are no written rights of kings and queens. Parliament, as the mandate of the prople has the right to choose its king, as James II found out in 1688, or George III during the regency.
If Charles had a devine right to be king, we as the people of Britain would not have a right to abolish the king.
Andrew
Originally posted by latex bishopbut she does have a system of "by use and wont", and i really don't that that the british government is too bothered that charles shall become king before william...
Britain does not have a written constitution - there are no written rights of kings and queens. Parliament, as the mandate of the prople has the right to choose its king, as James II found out in 1688, or George III during the regency.
If Charles had a devine right to be king, we as the people of Britain would not have a right to abolish the king.
Andrew