Originally posted by scacchipazzoI don't think the rules allow for such a radical change.
Any conference that loses five bowls is an embarrassment as is a former top ten team beating an unranked team only by 28 points. Wisconsin actually acquitted itself well against a superior team. MSU really was an embarrassment. As you well know I picked OSU to beat the Razorbacks. Alleged superior conferences have fared poorly. Stanford really showed it ...[text shortened]... re they should.
Are you game for picking the EWash vs Delaware game for the game we skipped?
Otherwise, we could see picking High School games in their place.
Just my opinion though.
I am not going to win anyway, but I came back from the gates of hell and caught you guys.
Originally posted by shortcircuitIt takes a unanimous vote to allow such radical change. Can we count on yuour support?
I don't think the rules allow for such a radical change.
Otherwise, we could see picking High School games in their place.
Just my opinion though.
I am not going to win anyway, but I came back from the gates of hell and caught you guys.
Originally posted by whodeyWell, not that I am often in agreement with No1, I have to say here I tend to agree with him.
He acts like money is on the line or something.
No worries, we'll get'em next year!! ðŸ˜
It is not like everyone didn't have the same opportunity to post their picks originally.
Then, it was pointed out that Whodey's list was not complete, and you both amended your lists.
How many chances did you need?
He picked them timely, and he may well win.
If he does congratulate him, because he did it fairly.
You really wouldn't want a tainted win anyway, would you??
Originally posted by shortcircuitTaint the picks? The games have not even been played. I suppose you could argue that your picks could change according to the lastest news, but I have not heard any about the schools in question.
Well, not that I am often in agreement with No1, I have to say here I tend to agree with him.
It is not like everyone didn't have the same opportunity to post their picks originally.
Then, it was pointed out that Whodey's list was not complete, and you both amended your lists.
How many chances did you need?
He picked them timely, and he may ...[text shortened]... te him, because he did it fairly.
You really wouldn't want a tainted win anyway, would you??
As for myself, I did not ask for such mercy did I? I simply did not think it such a big deal to show mercy to others on this thread. Nonetheless, we must all consent since we are all participating. Having said that, so be it.
Originally posted by whodeySimple human error. It's not like we asked for the OU-CT game to be awarded after the fact. It ain't no big deal at all! Five college ball games left! Off season will be long and boring indeed!
Taint the picks? The games have not even been played. I suppose you could argue that your picks could change according to the lastest news, but I have not heard any about the schools in question.
As for myself, I did not ask for such mercy did I? I simply did not think it such a big deal to show mercy to others on this thread. Nonetheless, we must all consent since we are all participating. Having said that, so be it.
Originally posted by scacchipazzoI oppose changing the rules AFTER a game has started. If that's "heartless", so be it.
Simple human error. It's not like we asked for the OU-CT game to be awarded after the fact. It ain't no big deal at all! Five college ball games left! Off season will be long and boring indeed!