1 edit
@drewnogal saidThere are interesting theories that I have come across - not speculations but views and explanations by experts and experienced people how it happened and what went wrong - not one reason but several.
It sounds like you’ve done a lot of reading and research on this. I imagine you know more than any of us here on the subject.
@great-big-stees saidSome ships are ice strengthened if it is expected they will regularly encounter ice. Whether the vessel would sink if it hit an iceberg would depend upon a number of factors including the speed the vessel was travelling just before impact.
I wonder if an “Icebreaker” would sink if it hit an iceberg? After all they are built to go through ice and an iceberg is just a large chunk of ice.🤔
'Icebreakers' like the ones used by the Canadian Coastguard to break out ships that have become stuck in the St. Lawrence would be unlikely to sink if they hit an iceberg.
3 edits
@the-gravedigger saidThe construction of the Titanic was, as I understand it, strong enough for a front collision but it hit the iceberg on the side where it was weaker and that was to avoid a collision at all, and the ice cut through the material like a razor.
Some ships are ice strengthened if it is expected they will regularly encounter ice. Whether the vessel would sink if it hit an iceberg would depend upon a number of factors including the speed the vessel was travelling just before impact.
'Icebreakers' like the ones used by the Canadian Coastguard to break out ships that have become stuck in the St. Lawrence would be unlikely to sink if they hit an iceberg.
That is what I have learned.
Edit: many edits 🙂
@fmf saidUsing the pass tense word 'was', are you saying OceanGate is out of business now?
OceanGate was a company in the tourism sector.
-VR