Dog Control: Baby Toes Vs. Pitbull

Originally posted by zintieriv
what about the benefits dogs provide to us ?
on rescue missions, their abilities to detect explosives, illegal drugs, & recently to detect cancer on urine samples !

Private ownership is what needs to be banned. Constructive use by our military, police, medical practicioners and other government regulated programs is perfectly acceptable.

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Some dogs are OK

Hand of Hecate: Dog Lover

After you've been mauled to death by a rabid band of ill-tempered chihuahuas, that's what it'll say on your tombstone unless you take a firm stand now, and quit with this shilly-shallying appeasement.

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Don't even get me started on guns... still, in the US you have the right to bear arms and you don't have the right to own dogs.... ban dogs and then focus on the people and guns.

As far as people go, we need to target anyone that is different from us first.

"As far as people go, we need to target anyone that is different from us first."

This should be enough to be banned.

Originally posted by Mephisto2
"As far as people go, we need to target anyone that is different from us first."

This should be enough to be banned.

If you're serious, or if you're not, I don't think HoH is.

I think this thread is a parody of the debate over private gun ownership. Since HoH is a gun nut who enjoys proving his superiority to pigs by shooting them with weapons which he did not design or build, I suspect that this thread is meant to argue against some form of gun control. Unfortunately, if that is the case, it's a false analogy and crap argument.

Originally posted by Mephisto2
"As far as people go, we need to target anyone that is different from us first."

This should be enough to be banned.

Who am I being racist against and who have I defined as 'We'. You should be among the first to be fed to the dogs.

Edit: Plonker.

Originally posted by royalchicken
If you're serious, or if you're not, I don't think HoH is.

I think this thread is a parody of the debate over private gun ownership. Since HoH is a gun nut who enjoys proving his superiority to pigs by shooting them with weapons which he did not design or build, I suspect that this thread is meant to argue against some form of gun control. Unfortunately, if that is the case, it's a [b]false analogy and crap argument.[/b]

Smarter than the average bear aren't you.

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Smarter than the average bear aren't you.

Sufficiently, I hope, that you'd have qualms about shooting me if not the bear.

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Who am I being racist against and who have I defined as 'We'. You should be among the first to be fed to the dogs.

Edit: Plonker.

Don't try to hide behind 'we'. You only make it worse.

Originally posted by Mephisto2
Don't try to hide behind 'we'. You only make it worse.

Don't try to hide behind being a plonker, we all know that you harbor a deep seated hatred of Mexicans.

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Don't try to hide behind being a plonker, we all know that you harbor a deep seated hatred of Mexicans.

Especially those who use dog meat in their chili con carne.

Originally posted by royalchicken
Sufficiently, I hope, that you'd have qualms about shooting me if not the bear.

Bear tastes horrible, given your sedentary lifestyle, your backstrap is probably nice and tender. While you'd not be my first choice, marinated, wrapped in bacon and thrown on the grill, you'd probably be quite tasty, especially if your backstrap is prepared with a mushroom and peppercorn sherry cream sauce. As a result, I'd probably shoot you before the bear.

Originally posted by Mephisto2
Especially those who use dog meat in their chili con carne.

Better than using cows (especially if they are code cows).

Originally posted by Nordlys
Better than using cows (especially if they are code cows).

Are there Faith Cows?

Originally posted by royalchicken
Are there Faith Cows?

I am not sure. You'd have to ask a Russian.