Originally posted by MerchantParkProSo, you admit that you actually saw Shrek? Did you like 1 or 2 better?
It's interesting how all the extremely low rated morons that can't play chess are the biggest flamers. WHAT A COINCIDENCE!!
You probably didn't grasp 10% of what Kubrick was going for in that movie loser.....stick to films you can understand....like "Shrek".
BTW:I consider Shrek to be a rather high quality movie.
The post that was quoted here has been removed....i an white...appalachain white....but i am married to a chinese lady
so you good sir have half-insulted my offspring....good christian children
going to the univeristy in salt lake with my friends the mormons ( almost
mostly white )...so it is time for you to roll up inside your sheet and
go out on the back porch to freeze to death...will you be missed in the
morning ?...
Originally posted by MerchantParkProWhats wrong with Shrek?
It's interesting how all the extremely low rated morons that can't play chess are the biggest flamers. WHAT A COINCIDENCE!!
You probably didn't grasp 10% of what Kubrick was going for in that movie loser.....stick to films you can understand....like "Shrek".
The post that was quoted here has been removedIt's a good thing my brain is still developing - maybe one day I can be as cool and intellectual as you!
Just because you read Ayn Rand and Hitler does not mean that you are intelligent - you can only hope (a futile hope at that...) that you may try to fool me into believing you have an IQ in the triple-digits.
Originally posted by Ice ColdMaybe MerchantParkPro could explain it to you - he says he's really smart, he might even go so far as to claim that Einstein pales in comparison!
Originally posted by HomerJSimpson
[b]Whats wrong with Shrek?
I don't know, I couldn't even understand that movie. π[/b]
Of course, he's full of crap.
1 edit
Originally posted by MerchantParkPro1) You don't need a high rating to play chess.
It's interesting how all the extremely low rated morons that can't play chess are the biggest flamers. WHAT A COINCIDENCE!!
You probably didn't grasp 10% of what Kubrick was going for in that movie loser.....stick to films you can understand....like "Shrek".
2)Rating at chess has absolutely no bearing on intelligence.
3)The type of books you read has no bearing on intelligence.
4)The type of movies you watch has no bearing on intelligence.
5)Disagreement with 1,2,3,and 4 has a bearing on intelligence.
Morons can be at any rating - as you have demonstrated.
The post that was quoted here has been removedIQ under 80...so that's basically the "I know you are but what am I?!" approach, right?
And you've proven with your posts that are completely incapable of maintaining a social relationship of any kind.
Are you sure you still aren't 10?
Really? It seems I get more respect on these forums than you do - that's the only primary source example that could possibly be used.
Your last sentence is obviously a fallacy, but I don't need to let it bother me since I know how I stand socially.