26 Jul 04
Feivel was an advocate of removing the Bible study threads to the general forum, because they were supposed to be religious spam. Now he is engaging himself in a DEBATE with RBHILL on the subjects he is presenting to us.
Feivel can't have it both ways. Either he stops debating on the General Forum or he has to become an advocate of moving the Bible study threads to the debates forum where he can discuss the issues RBHILL is presenting to us in his Bible study threads.
...... Feivel cannot have it both ways.
My proposal is to move these threads to the Debates forum where they belong.
What is your opinion guys ?
26 Jul 04
Originally posted by FeivelFeivel: "Shouldn't this piece of trash be in the debate forum since it is asking for "debate"?[/b]"
Ivanhoe...I made a mistake by acknowkeding you. You are the worst example of a brain dead christian I have ever seen. Your only purpose is to make moronic accusations without reading other peoples posts first. There is NO reason you started this thread and this will be the last time I [b]EVER acknowledge that a moron such as you exists. I also wonder how ...[text shortened]... [/b]
Shouldn't this piece of trash be in the debate forum since it is asking for "debate"?[/b]
No Feivel, because this question is aimed at the users of the General Forum and it is about the content of the General forum. Your formal way of reasoning cannot conceal this.
26 Jul 04
1 edit
Originally posted by ivanhoe"formal way of reasoning" - ROTFL!!
No Feivel, because this question is aimed at the users of the General Forum and it is about the content of the General forum. Your formal way of reasoning cannot conceal this.
Feivel is just about the only person on the debates forum (besides RBHILL - who atleast never claims to) who CAN'T seem to follow formal logic. 😀
26 Jul 04
1 edit
Originally posted by FeivelFeivel.....This is the last time....for sure......yep.....
That brain dead waste of life fired the first shot but don't worry cause I am not gonna waste my "breath" acknowledging it anymore. BTW, if you really care you can always read my post in RBHILL's week 1 thread and see what I really asked ...[text shortened]... ed suicide to be made legal you see it in it's posts 🙂
Feivel
Did he mean it?
What do you think guys?
26 Jul 04
1 edit
Originally posted by FeivelLOL. That you don't seem to understand what I mean by formal logic illustrates my point. QED.
Because I see no rhyme or reason in you citing the bible as proof of the bible I can't use logic? That's a pretty logical (not to mention astute) conclusion. I can see it now, this thread is going to turn into another christian "let's ba ...[text shortened]... able of being. God is love reflected in you guys my ass.
Feivel
In any case, the absence of logic is not in your not letting me cite the Bible as proof of the Bible. The absence of logic is in your not letting me cite anything as proof of the Bible - something which, when analysed using the rules of formal logic, boils down to an unshakeable assumption (if this were a religious tenet - it would be called dogma) that the Bible is false/unprovable.
RBHILL and you are just two sides of the same coin - at least his intentions are pure.
26 Jul 04
Originally posted by RavelloI think these religious idiots (read fundamentalist christians) won't be satisfied until they get Russ to ban ALL religious talk from the forums. I guess there brains are shut off and they can't see that this thread is a huge push in that direction.
This was asked three times here:
my answer is that this thread is bulls**t and should be deleted.
Feivel