Originally posted by BridgePlayerNah they wouldn't do that due to the increase in likelihood of injury, and also possible exhaustion for the next game. Penaltys is the only way, though the idea of letting the team with the most corners win (in order to encourage attacking play) is a good one.
Playing until someone scores would be interesting. It would come down to which team is the most fit. I think we would have some loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong matches though, and with only 3 subs, any team that got involved in such a match would be finished for their next game if they managed to win.
Ref had a great game I thought! Well done that man from Slovakia.
Originally posted by sasquatch672the problem is Portugal, England even winning will gonna get a lot of injured players ... I guess Germany its on the finals ....
Smaug of Sicilian Origin,
I cannot verify that Thomas Jefferson ever accurately predicted the outcome of a World Cup quarterfinal, but I strongly suspect he did. After all, we're talking about Jefferson! However...mmmff. Have to beat traffic. Well done Ess Ess, to all others: GO ENGLAND!!!!!
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeethe number of shots to goal wouldn't be better ?
Nah they wouldn't do that due to the increase in likelihood of injury, and also possible exhaustion for the next game. Penaltys is the only way, though the idea of letting the team with the most corners win (in order to encourage attacking play) is a good one.
Ref had a great game I thought! Well done that man from Slovakia.
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugWe are not worthy oh great one!!
Did I not say?? π
Great Nostradamus style prediction, I'll pay that.
It was good to watch, even though it finished around 4am local time. I did wonder why the penalty count was so, so low?? They had a fair bash at each other. Maybe FIFA had who they wanted in their final eight tounament? I'm real curious?
France played well in their match. Slapped the Ukraine and called them Susan!! Totti was on fire