1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaIt's relevant, because you said they jumped on the bandwagon. They are allowed to post to enter into a discussion okay. You can only see it as that, fair enough. Okay?
How is that even relevant?
They used your complaints to attack BWA and call them racists. Do you think racism is an accusation that can be made lightly?
Racism, is something that should not be taking lightly. It's a very contentious issue.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveI thought the avatar was worth deletion, but i have a life....and haven't spent the last week farting about here playing with my tally wacker.
I must be blind then. 😕
Didn't Chris admit he never knew who the avatar was?
Personally, I think it was a rushed decision with not much thought used.
Enjoy....losers.
Originally posted by PalynkaYou are assuming though, that there could have been a thread in the Club, and that I read it, and from there, it had given some dutch courage to speak out.
Thanks for your reasoned post cash. Let me tell you where I stand:
1. I defended the legitimacy of her complaint. If you go back to the original thread, you'll see me defending her. On the grounds that many people would not recognize the avatar as Kunta Kinte and so would misinterpret it.
2. You'd also see me defending BWA members from blanket accusati ...[text shortened]... ehand, so now I don't know why she isn't willing to admit that might have played a part.
No matter how many times, I would say, they had in no way influenced me, you will assume a differing opinion.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveHow can it be a rushed decision? Chris would have had up to a week, of knowing about the avatar, from me sending feedback. And how many pages, had it taken, before he made it clear of his decision.
I must be blind then. 😕
Didn't Chris admit he never knew who the avatar was?
Personally, I think it was a rushed decision with not much thought used.
Originally posted by Elamef37Did you read his post? He said he removed it but couldn't be bothered to read the discussion.
How can it be a rushed decision? Chris would have had up to a week, of knowing about the avatar, from me sending feedback. And how many pages, had it taken, before he made it clear of his decision.
Originally posted by PalynkaWrong, I wasn't pigeonholing you. You are the only one, to this point, that has said, there is the difference in saying it was racist in nature to saying its racist or the person was. It just hadn't clicked with no1. He could only see Racist. He doesn't see, that I said, it was Racist in nature.
I've been repeating that all along. If you weren't pigeonholing me along with no1 then you would have realized that by now.
Originally posted by Elamef37If it wasn't a rushed decision that makes it worse. It should have been investigated first.
How can it be a rushed decision? Chris would have had up to a week, of knowing about the avatar, from me sending feedback. And how many pages, had it taken, before he made it clear of his decision.
IN MY OPINION.