Go back
Goodbyte all - the Liquidaor

Goodbyte all - the Liquidaor

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
What happened BEFORE the "inappropriate" thread?
Keep up, will ya!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Any chance of a quick descript of this thread? (can't be arsed reading it)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
Any chance of a quick descript of this thread? (can't be arsed reading it)
I was thinking the same thing. I can't bear to read it all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
http://www.timeforchess.com/club/games.php?clubid=15&p1uid=329991
Palynka, it's true. I was never even aware that Elamef37 was a member of the SM. I actually met her in another club while playing a tournament to the best of my knowledge. She was a very "silent" member of the Silent majority at that time. Pretty much like some of the clubs you and I are in together. Some chat and some lurk. But I am sure she has done some reading and lurking in this very forum before she ever posted. Most people do that. She has a right to alert things same as everyone else please support her right to do that. I know you are probably of a split mind on this issue. But please welcome her and lets stop this TSM vs Everyone else feud. She had a legitimate complaint.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I'm more inclined to think they pushed the wagon. Elamef37's evasions are making that conclusion more and more likely.
Seems, you're inclined to think that. So be it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Elamef37
Like any other poster, they're allowed to enter into a discussion. Or would you rather they get 'permission to speak'
How is that even relevant?

They used your complaints to attack BWA and call them racists. Do you think racism is an accusation that can be made lightly?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
Any chance of a quick descript of this thread? (can't be arsed reading it)
Liquid had a goodbite on something, he still hasn't said what.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
How is that even relevant?

They used your complaints to attack BWA and call them racists. Do you think racism is an accusation that can be made lightly?
Yes, she does. From page 1 of the "inappropriate" thread:

Originally posted by Sushill
What is inappropriate about a black man in chains?


elameF37: How about it being racist in nature and offensive

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Palynka, it's true. I was never even aware that Elamef37 was a member of the SM. I actually met her in another club while playing a tournament to the best of my knowledge. She was a very "silent" member of the Silent majority at that time. Pretty much like some of the clubs you and I are in together. Some chat and some lurk. But I am sure she has done s ...[text shortened]... ase welcome her and lets stop this TSM vs Everyone else feud. She had a legitimate complaint.
No, she didn't. She made an ignorant, ill-informed accusation that another user had a "racist" avatar.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by yo its me
Liquid had a goodbite on something, he still hasn't said what.
Someone said it was ice cream. Silly eh? 😀

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
How many of the RN faction are begging the mods to close the thread now that they have been thoroughly shown up as being in the wrong? 😕
In that case lets keep it open. You are blind if you think Chris was wrong. I wanted it closed because we have been talking non stop for almost two weeks of whatever. It's tiresome. But if you want to join in lets have a go.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Palynka, it's true. I was never even aware that Elamef37 was a member of the SM. I actually met her in another club while playing a tournament to the best of my knowledge. She was a very "silent" member of the Silent majority at that time. Pretty much like some of the clubs you and I are in together. Some chat and some lurk. But I am sure she has done s ...[text shortened]... ase welcome her and lets stop this TSM vs Everyone else feud. She had a legitimate complaint.
Thanks for your reasoned post cash. Let me tell you where I stand:

1. I defended the legitimacy of her complaint. If you go back to the original thread, you'll see me defending her. On the grounds that many people would not recognize the avatar as Kunta Kinte and so would misinterpret it.

2. You'd also see me defending BWA members from blanket accusations of racism. Sushill, in particular, has not done a single thing to indicate that he might be possibly one. I don't think racism is an accusation to be done lightly.

3. The main instigator of these blanket accusations was Red Night. You can also see that in that thread. Knowing his obsession about BWA, I wouldn't be surprised that there was a thread about them in the club. Elamef37 could be influenced by reading only his opinion. She admitted knowing 'about' them beforehand, so now I don't know why she isn't willing to admit that might have played a part.

Vote Up
Vote Down

My ball's itchy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Yes, she does. From page 1 of the "inappropriate" thread:

Originally posted by Sushill
What is inappropriate about a black man in chains?


elameF37: How about it being racist in nature and offensive
She didn't call him racist. She said that an avatar about a black man in chains was offensive and racist in nature. These are important differences.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
My ball's itchy.
You're absolutely right. How the hell did I end up here when I came to tell them it was pointless? 😞