General Forum

General Forum

  1. Subscribermoonbus
    Uber-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    2365
    21 Mar '16 12:15
    http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality

    I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really.
  2. Dumnonia
    Joined
    16 Feb '08
    Moves
    88320
    21 Mar '16 12:261 edit
    "Moderately nefarious".
    Slightly less bland 😛
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    21 Mar '16 12:33
    Originally posted by moonbus
    http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality

    I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really.
    Infrequently vile
    You are infrequently vile – you mostly put others before yourself, though you may find occasions in which your dark side shines.

    If FMF takes the test he might blow the server up with his nefarious Machiavellian psychopathic tendencies.
  4. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    526170
    21 Mar '16 12:39
    infrequently vile it was also for me narcissm>machiavellianism>psychopathy
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52774
    21 Mar '16 12:39
    same here. It's fixed I tell ya🙂
  6. Standard memberSeitse
    Doug Stanhope
    That's Why I Drink
    Joined
    01 Jan '06
    Moves
    33672
    21 Mar '16 12:45
    Nefarious? Gee...
  7. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    21 Mar '16 12:52
    Another 'infrequently vile'. Low on psychopathy, above average on narcissism and Machiavellianism.
  8. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    526170
    21 Mar '16 12:58
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    same here. It's fixed I tell ya🙂
    I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness 😉
  9. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    21 Mar '16 13:22
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness 😉
    I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.

    However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies 🙂
  10. SubscriberPonderable
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    526170
    21 Mar '16 13:32
    Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
    I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.

    However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies 🙂
    I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be 😉 while you answered to be saintly I presume?
  11. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    21 Mar '16 13:38
    Originally posted by Ponderable
    I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be 😉 while you answered to be saintly I presume?
    Oh, er, ah, um... Yes. I forgot the point of the test.
  12. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    21 Mar '16 13:43
    Decidedly dastardly is, I think, the 'maximum darkness'. I got max on 2 out of 3 with only slightly below it for narcissm.
  13. Joined
    14 Mar '04
    Moves
    97143
    21 Mar '16 14:24
    "Infrequently vile". Seems to be the "Norm".
  14. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    10321
    21 Mar '16 14:50
    Moderately nefarious.
  15. Subscriberrookie54
    free tazer tickles..
    wildly content...
    Joined
    09 Mar '08
    Moves
    138501
    21 Mar '16 15:15
    i scored trump...
Back to Top