Go back
how dark is your personality ?

how dark is your personality ?

General

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
21 Mar 16

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality

I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
21 Mar 16
1 edit

"Moderately nefarious".
Slightly less bland πŸ˜›

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
21 Mar 16

Originally posted by moonbus
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality

I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really.
Infrequently vile
You are infrequently vile – you mostly put others before yourself, though you may find occasions in which your dark side shines.

If FMF takes the test he might blow the server up with his nefarious Machiavellian psychopathic tendencies.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669928
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

infrequently vile it was also for me narcissm>machiavellianism>psychopathy

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

same here. It's fixed I tell yaπŸ™‚

Seitse
Doug Stanhope

That's Why I Drink

Joined
01 Jan 06
Moves
33672
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Nefarious? Gee...

N

Joined
10 Nov 12
Moves
6889
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Another 'infrequently vile'. Low on psychopathy, above average on narcissism and Machiavellianism.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669928
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
same here. It's fixed I tell yaπŸ™‚
I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness πŸ˜‰

N

Joined
10 Nov 12
Moves
6889
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ponderable
I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness πŸ˜‰
I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.

However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies πŸ™‚

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669928
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.

However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies πŸ™‚
I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be πŸ˜‰ while you answered to be saintly I presume?

N

Joined
10 Nov 12
Moves
6889
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ponderable
I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be πŸ˜‰ while you answered to be saintly I presume?
Oh, er, ah, um... Yes. I forgot the point of the test.

N

Joined
10 Nov 12
Moves
6889
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

Decidedly dastardly is, I think, the 'maximum darkness'. I got max on 2 out of 3 with only slightly below it for narcissm.

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186301
Clock
21 Mar 16
Vote Up
Vote Down

"Infrequently vile". Seems to be the "Norm".

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19036
Clock
21 Mar 16

Moderately nefarious.

rookie54
free tazer tickles..

wildly content...

Joined
09 Mar 08
Moves
205521
Clock
21 Mar 16

i scored trump...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.