Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
General Forum
Joined 31 May '12 Moves 8253 http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality
I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really.
Joined 16 Feb '08 Moves 116779 "Moderately nefarious".
Slightly less bland π
Account suspended
Joined 26 Aug '07 Moves 38239 Originally posted by moonbus
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20151123-how-dark-is-your-personality
I rated "infrequently vile." Rather bland, really. Infrequently vile
You are infrequently vile – you mostly put others before yourself, though you may find occasions in which your dark side shines.
If FMF takes the test he might blow the server up with his nefarious Machiavellian psychopathic tendencies.
Linkenheim
Joined 22 Apr '05 Moves 655255 infrequently vile it was also for me narcissm>machiavellianism>psychopathy
slatington, pa, usa
Joined 28 Dec '04 Moves 53223 same here. It's fixed I tell yaπ
That's Why I Drink
Joined 01 Jan '06 Moves 33672
Joined 10 Nov '12 Moves 6889 Another 'infrequently vile'. Low on psychopathy, above average on narcissism and Machiavellianism.
Linkenheim
Joined 22 Apr '05 Moves 655255 Originally posted by sonhouse
same here. It's fixed I tell yaπ I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness π
Joined 10 Nov '12 Moves 6889 Originally posted by Ponderable
I trioed to get full marks on all (by answering untruthfully), but didn't manage. I got decidely dastardly. Psychopathy still the weakness π I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.
However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies π
Linkenheim
Joined 22 Apr '05 Moves 655255 Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
I just did the same and got Shockingly Saintly, with zero P, low M and below average N.
However, it's clear that infrequently vile people make up the backbone of our societies π I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be π while you answered to be saintly I presume?
Joined 10 Nov '12 Moves 6889 Originally posted by Ponderable
I think we have different definitions of "full marks" I tried to be as evil as it can be π while you answered to be saintly I presume? Oh, er, ah, um... Yes. I forgot the point of the test.
Joined 10 Nov '12 Moves 6889 Decidedly dastardly is, I think, the 'maximum darkness'. I got max on 2 out of 3 with only slightly below it for narcissm.
Joined 14 Mar '04 Moves 175706 "Infrequently vile". Seems to be the "Norm".
Joined 10 Jan '08 Moves 16950
wildly content...
Joined 09 Mar '08 Moves 200982
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More . I Agree