1. Joined
    10 Jan '08
    Moves
    16940
    22 Mar '16 11:32
    Originally posted by Metacomedian
    I refuse to take a test that I cannot manipulate .
    You can lie in the test πŸ˜‰
  2. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36571
    22 Mar '16 12:48
    "Infrequently vile" seems to be the norm.
  3. Joined
    25 Feb '16
    Moves
    3653
    22 Mar '16 13:35
    Originally posted by Trev33
    You can lie in the test πŸ˜‰
    Since someone with a true dark personality would lie in the test, the more vanilla the result, more dangerous is the person. It seems to be Great Big Stees.
  4. Joined
    14 Mar '04
    Moves
    173581
    22 Mar '16 13:38
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    "Infrequently vile" seems to be the norm.
    Is there an echo? πŸ˜‰
  5. Joined
    14 Mar '04
    Moves
    173581
    22 Mar '16 13:39
    Originally posted by Metacomedian
    Since someone with a true dark personality would lie in the test, the more vanilla the result, more dangerous is the person. It seems to be Great Big Stees.
    What, exactly, are you insinuating?πŸ˜²πŸ˜ πŸ˜€
  6. Joined
    25 Feb '16
    Moves
    3653
    22 Mar '16 13:44
    I salute and venerate you, Master of Darkness!
  7. Joined
    14 Mar '04
    Moves
    173581
    22 Mar '16 13:45
    Originally posted by Metacomedian
    I salute and venerate you, Master of Darkness!
    Hang on a minute. Let me get "The Ring".
  8. Joined
    25 Feb '16
    Moves
    3653
    22 Mar '16 13:49
    Originally posted by Great Big Stees
    Hang on a minute. Let me get "The Ring".
    Let me be by your side. I shall be to my master someone as precious as that little whimsical creature was to the great Jabba The Hut.
  9. Joined
    10 Nov '12
    Moves
    6889
    22 Mar '16 13:49
    If you concentrate all your vileness into your use of rhp, but are reasonably benign outside it, are you still 'infrequently vile'? Robbie?
  10. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8142
    22 Mar '16 18:14
    Originally posted by Great Big Stees
    What, exactly, are you insinuating?πŸ˜²πŸ˜ πŸ˜€
    He's not insinuating anything. He's calling you a sheep in sheep's clothing.
  11. Joined
    14 Mar '04
    Moves
    173581
    23 Mar '16 00:55
    Originally posted by moonbus
    He's not insinuating anything. He's calling you a sheep in sheep's clothing.
    Much too obvious. It's a lot deeper than that I'm afraid.
  12. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8142
    23 Mar '16 05:47
    Ok, a sheep in wolf's clothing in sheep's clothing.
  13. SubscriberPonderableonline
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    653659
    23 Mar '16 08:44
    Originally posted by NoEarthlyReason
    If you concentrate all your vileness into your use of rhp, but are reasonably benign outside it, are you still 'infrequently vile'? Robbie?
    That depends if you login frequently or infrequently πŸ˜‰
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree