Go back
Impressive

Impressive

General

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

User 520523. Banned at the dizzy rating heights of 75 - having had a rating as low as 1.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Swiss Toni
User 520523. Banned at the dizzy rating heights of 75 - having had a rating as low as 1.
how is that possible?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

seems to be a good mate of User 520456, who is at the dizzying heights of 437.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
seems to be a good mate of User 520456, who is at the dizzying heights of 437.
User 520523 and User 520456 seem to have played many games together which were resigned after a few moves. Why would anyone do that?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by acb123
User 520523 and User 520456 seem to have played many games together which were resigned after a few moves. Why would anyone do that?
do you want to start a few games against me and then resign them after 3 moves?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
seems to be a good mate of User 520456, who is at the dizzying heights of 437.
I'm surprised he's still here. 😲

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I thought Send Feedback is what was done in these cases?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
do you want to start a few games against me and then resign them after 3 moves?
As I said, what would be the point? Neither of them gained any ranking points. They were both provisionally ranked players. They just draw attention to themselves. I suppose they could be just one player, but why the silly games?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by acb123
As I said, what would be the point? Neither of them gained any ranking points. They were both provisionally ranked players. They just draw attention to themselves. I suppose they could be just one player, but why the silly games?
A lot of people find joy in pursuing pointless endevours.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by acb123
As I said, what would be the point? Neither of them gained any ranking points. They were both provisionally ranked players. They just draw attention to themselves. I suppose they could be just one player, but why the silly games?
neither of them got any ranking points? if they played 3 moves and it was a rated game they did regardless of it they were only provisional or not.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
neither of them got any ranking points? if they played 3 moves and it was a rated game they did regardless of it they were only provisional or not.
If you look at their graphs, they both went further down after each resignation. They would have been better off not playing at all.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
A lot of people find joy in pursuing pointless endevours.
I wouldn't call a three move resignation much of an endeavour.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Swiss Toni
User 520523. Banned at the dizzy rating heights of 75 - having had a rating as low as 1.
Must've been using an engine from 1965.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Must've been using an engine from 1965.
The first mouse was invented in 1964. Do you think engines were around then?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.