Go back
is Kamala ..

is Kamala ..

General

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@ogb said
good looking?
She is, but is it relevant?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@torunn said
She is, but is it relevant?
Ahh, dear Torunn, must we remind you of the wicked ways of man? 🤔 We look!

1 edit
Vote Up
4
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
Ahh, dear Torunn, must we remind you of the wicked ways of man? 🤔 We look!
If only good-looking men were successful, there may not be so many. But they may think they are. 🙂

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@Torunn

I'm a believer that nature has a reason for everything. But that's just me

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@torunn said
If only good-looking men were successful, there may not be so many. But they may think they are. 🙂
The successful men don't have to be good-looking. Just as Trump!!! 😉

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@torunn said
She is, but is it relevant?
all women are way more concerned with their looks than men...

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

No fat chicks allowed in my treehouse!

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
Ahh, dear Torunn, must we remind you of the wicked ways of man? 🤔 We look!
If you listen, you might learn something.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@very-rusty said
I am, you accuse others of name calling and do the same yourself.

Do you think the rules are not meant for you also?

-VR
I have never accused anyone of 'name-calling' unless the name they were calling was sexist or racist. There's a difference that you fail to understand.

And 'rules' can generally kiss my ass. There is a time for breaking rules, but scared little numpties never figure that out.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
Ahh, dear Torunn, must we remind you of the wicked ways of man? 🤔 We look!
Women look too and that’s one of the reasons that Trump ( the fat boy with silly hair ) doesn’t do so well with them, but just one of the reasons.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

-Removed-
I remember reading an excellent description of the stage in cognitive development at which people learn that rules are to serve people as opposed to people blindly serving rules. It was in the introduction to a study that suggested only one third of a random sample of adults had reached the stage of understanding the difference. A forget the proportion who were overly concerned about ambulances committing parking violations in life or death situations, but it was more than you might imagine. There were also of course the people who justified breaking social rules when the timing was inappropriate, suggesting they were somehow acting for the greater good.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@suzianne said
I have never accused anyone of 'name-calling' unless the name they were calling was sexist or racist. There's a difference that you fail to understand.

And 'rules' can generally kiss my ass. There is a time for breaking rules, but scared little numpties never figure that out.
Of course you call names Suzie Q....Calling someone an idiot is name calling rather it applies or not! 😛 😉

I could make you a list of names you've called people and how you've put them down or tried to, but it would get very long and boring and besides everyone knows!

-VR

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@very-rusty said
Of course you call names Suzie Q....Calling someone an idiot is name calling rather it applies or not! 😛 😉

I could make you a list of names you've called people and how you've put them down or tried to, but it would get very long and boring and besides everyone knows!

-VR
... whether it applies or not. How many times do I have to tell you about this?


And why are you going on about me calling others what they are?

I said, "I have never accused anyone of 'name-calling' unless the name they were calling was sexist or racist. There's a difference that you fail to understand."

Nothing in here about me not calling others names, especially when they deserve it. So get down off your high horse, for once.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
OMG, dive called me a sinner. Whatever shall I do?