Go back
Longest running game on RHP

Longest running game on RHP

General

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186367
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Can anyone tell me which it might have been?

Drewnogal
Constant Gardener

The Plot

Joined
07 Aug 12
Moves
53198
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@great-big-stees said
Can anyone tell me which it might have been?
Have no idea. Can give you one of the shortest though?

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186367
Clock
17 Jun 19

@drewnogal said
Have no idea. Can give you one of the shortest though?
Ouch! Ya know drewnone...I used to like you.

Russ
RHP Code Monkey

RHP HQ

Joined
21 Feb 01
Moves
2450
Clock
17 Jun 19
2 edits

Game moves are archived off in to 'silos' in our database, by year, from the day the game was created. So long, long games can be a very minor annoyance!

So, from 2011, this game Game 8825816

edit : 2nd place Game 9524929

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186367
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Russ

Thank you sir.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
17 Jun 19
2 edits

@russ said
Game moves are archived off in to 'silos' in our database, by year, from the day the game was created. So long, long games can be a very minor annoyance!

So, from 2011, this game Game 8825816

edit : 2nd place Game 9524929
Longest running game parameters: 21 day timeout, 28 day timebank, Black has used up his timebank, and queens are still on the board. I reckon it’ll all be over soon. Any year now.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus

Takes special kind of people to enjoy that kind of game.

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

The player Great King Rat hasn't moved in months.
Timeouts should be automatic losses.

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm thinking about going for the record 🤔
With proper moves under a time control and claiming a timeout if it arises.
I have 12 games going so I'll have to wait for an opening and find a player who has played for years with no timeouts.

Anyone interested?

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hmmm by my rough math both players would have to use up the 21 days before each move.
Basically 6 weeks for each set of moves.
8 or 9 moves a year 🤔

It doesn't work.
That longest game must of had long periods of one player not moving with the other player not claiming a timeout.

Even if you go by the time control and use all of your time it would be 9 moves a year and to break the 8 year record would require a game to last into 70 plus moves which is rare unless done on purpose.

That "longest game" needs an asterisk beside it. Obviously it was only possible by not claiming timeouts.

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

They are on move 47.
Definitely done by not claiming a timeout.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@patzering said
The player Great King Rat hasn't moved in months.
Timeouts should be automatic losses.
Why?
Think of a single benefit!!

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

The time control is the agreed upon time limit.
If you violate that agreement you lose.
If we didn't follow those rules cowards like Bobby Fischer who ran away instead of playing would still be the champ.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@patzering said
The time control is the agreed upon time limit.
If you violate that agreement you lose.
If we didn't follow those rules cowards like Bobby Fischer who ran away instead of playing would still be the champ.
On the one hand you are extolling the virtue of rules,
and on the other you say you want the rule changed!

That does not make sense.

Additionally you have failed to give a reason why going
over the time control should be an automatic loss.

Patzering
is getting old...

Joined
13 Jun 19
Moves
17546
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

I want the rule changed?
No.
If you exceed the time limit it should be a loss and not at the discretion of your opponent.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.