Lasker eh?
He didn’t focus solely on chess eh?
He did math and philosophy and other stuff eh?
He still crushed everyone and was world champion for 27 years?
He didn’t even study and he would send his opponents into a rage when he played his own moves instead of the best move eh?
That was over 100 years ago eh?
If he was here today and focused on chess we would be in awe eh?
@old-indian saidFrom what I know about Magnus, he also did not follow a traditional route. His talent is more raw than the average GM that you simply cannot teach.
Lasker eh?
He didn’t focus solely on chess eh?
He did math and philosophy and other stuff eh?
He still crushed everyone and was world champion for 27 years?
He didn’t even study and he would send his opponents into a rage when he played his own moves instead of the best move eh?
So I reckon Magnus has a few more years to go to impress you then, eh?
27 Jan 20
@whodey saidIf Magnus wins the next two world championships I will say he is the best eh?
From what I know about Magnus, he also did not follow a traditional route. His talent is more raw than the average GM that you simply cannot teach.
So I reckon Magnus has a few more years to go to impress you then, eh?
He is definitely top 3 already eh?
The competition of today is way stronger than any other time so if he wins two more I will give him the title eh?
27 Jan 20
@earl-of-trumps saidBotvinnik!
If there is a case to be made for Lasker (there is) then there is a case to be made for Botvinnik.
Botvinnik's reign was not connected like Lasker's but it is believes the Soviets had Botvinnik lose WC matches to allow other Soviets (Tal) to claim title, too
The only world champion to win the title then lose it then win it back then lose it then win it back again eh?
That is perseverance eh?
27 Jan 20
@old-indian saidLasker was still holding his own in major tournaments into his sixties, drawing or defeating champions who succeeded him. His performance in NY 1924, for example, was stupendous.
Lasker eh?
He didn’t focus solely on chess eh?
He did math and philosophy and other stuff eh?
He still crushed everyone and was world champion for 27 years?
He didn’t even study and he would send his opponents into a rage when he played his own moves instead of the best move eh?
That was over 100 years ago eh?
If he was here today and focused on chess we would be in awe eh?
I second the motion for Lasker.
@moonbus saidWell it's hard to rate Magnus in a similar fashion because he is so young.
Lasker was still holding his own in major tournaments into his sixties, drawing or defeating champions who succeeded him. His performance in NY 1924, for example, was stupendous.
I second the motion for Lasker.
@whodey saidI think Bobby Fischer was the greatest
The greatest chess player of all time?
Yay or nay? If not, who then?
most dominate player ever
all other world champions had equal rivals
Fischer had none
I'd give second to Capablanca
the only knock against Fischer is that he was looney as a jay bird
27 Jan 20
@lemondrop saidAgain that was in a different time and era, how would they do against the best in todays world?
I think Bobby Fischer was the greatest
most dominate player ever
all other world champions had equal rivals
Fischer had none
I'd give second to Capablanca
the only knock against Fischer is that he was looney as a jay bird
-VR
@very-rusty saidFischer would delight in having so much chess knowledge at his fingertips
Again that was in a different time and era, how would they do against the best in todays world?
-VR
he would soak it up like sponge
on any level playing field
he would dominate
27 Jan 20
@lemondrop saidand he ran away from Karpov eh?
I think Bobby Fischer was the greatest
most dominate player ever
all other world champions had equal rivals
Fischer had none
I'd give second to Capablanca
the only knock against Fischer is that he was looney as a jay bird
@old-indian saidhe didn't run
and he ran away from Karpov eh?
he was mentally ill
he had a lot of demons