Go back
Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
If this is indeed what has happened, the previous turn might need to be replayed. Rob?
I think that's a terrible idea.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
I think that's a terrible idea.
Agreed. I don't want to be tortured again by seeing how all my provinces are beeing picked up. Also I know what you've done now, I could respond to it if the turn was replayed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Missing a turn is not the end of the world. It's not good, but it means all your enemies' expectations will be wrong and you'll be able to spend twice the money the next turn.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Personally, I am sick to death of this topic. I'd rather listen to Venice and Bavaria burn through ten more pages of pointless bickering than hear about anyone's alleged problems with their turn files. We're approaching turn 12 and have been playing this game for nearly three months. If you're STILL having trouble with your turn files then there's nothing anyone here can do for you. Please complain to the GM in private. This is the fifth game I've played with agegames and I've never had a single problem with any of my turn files.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Personally, I am sick to death of this topic. I'd rather listen to Venice and Bavaria burn through ten more pages of pointless bickering than hear about anyone's alleged problems with their turn files. We're approaching turn 12 and have been playing this game for nearly three months. If you're STILL having trouble with your turn files then there's nothing a ...[text shortened]... I've played with agegames and I've never had a single problem with any of my turn files.
I haven't had a problem with my turnfiles either, but I don't like discovering that my turnfiles, game details and password have been mailed to another registered player at Age Games. Such a mistake by the GM could lead to mischief. Anyway, Suzi must take it up with the GM in e-mail.

I brought this to everyone's attention, because if you don't get the turnfiles in your mail, you'd better query, pronto.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Aquitaine has found out about this thread. Then again, he's also joined RHP.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Aquitaine has found out about this thread. Then again, he's also joined RHP.
How did that happen? What's his username?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
How did that happen? What's his username?
I'm not sure...ask him (Gottschalk).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I'm not sure...ask him (Gottschalk).
And he's already got a victory with his opponent resigning after one move? Sounds fishy already.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Gee, maybe we should start the entire game over because one player isn't getting their turnfiles in in a timely manner and in a way they know the file is being processed. Better yet, why don't we all agree to give Suzi a free move and none of us move this turn. And maybe we should all send her 10 Gold apiece while we're at it. Would that be adequate comp turnfile on a previous turn; how come we didn't playTHAT one over?

EDIT: It was Turn 5.
Wow... overreact much?

Perhaps your allies need to think about why you might have this vendetta against me. And what it might cost them.

Edit: Strange... the phrase "your allies" still seems a contradiction to me...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Edit: Strange... the phrase "your allies" still seems a contradiction to me...
Would "chums" work better?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Would "chums" work better?
Chums would be even worse, implying, as it does, some friendliness quality or at the very least, familiarity. Even allies suggests some amount of friend factor (although not as much as chums), and that's the part I was finding contradictory.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Chums would be even worse, implying, as it does, some friendliness quality or at the very least, familiarity. Even allies suggests some amount of friend factor (although not as much as chums), and that's the part I was finding contradictory.
I dunno...the Italians were allied to both sides in WW1 & WW2!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Chums would be even worse, implying, as it does, some friendliness quality or at the very least, familiarity. Even allies suggests some amount of friend factor (although not as much as chums), and that's the part I was finding contradictory.
Only to a Heather would "ally" in an internet war game "require some amount of friend factor".

I wish you had submitted your turnfile last turn; if it was as moronic as most of them have been, you would have met even worse disasters than you did. Now you get to build a double amount of troops
(not that you know what to build anyway; make sure to build some Commanders to replace the one you got killed and be sure to make the force that's been sitting on Crete for 7 turns a little bit larger).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Only to a Heather would "ally" in an internet war game "require some amount of friend factor".
I don't think it would require that outside an internet war game either.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.