Go back
Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have no friends.

😞

--The End--

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I don't think it would require that outside an internet war game either.
Good point.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Personally, I am sick to death of this topic. I'd rather listen to Venice and Bavaria burn through ten more pages of pointless bickering than hear about anyone's alleged problems with their turn files. We're approaching turn 12 and have been playing this game for nearly three months. If you're STILL having trouble with your turn files then there's nothing a ...[text shortened]... I've played with agegames and I've never had a single problem with any of my turn files.
Well, you wont be listening to any bickering between Venice and Bavaria.
Bavaria is done responding to all of the goading comments that Venice makes, if you have not figured that out.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Well, you wont be listening to any bickering between Venice and Bavaria.
Bavaria is done responding to all of the goading comments that Venice makes, if you have not figured that out.
No wonder, after all that "you're already completely beaten, you just won't admit it" crap you were spewing out last month. Nostradamus you ain't.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Wow... overreact much?

Perhaps your allies need to think about why you might have this vendetta against me. And what it might cost them.

Edit: Strange... the phrase "your allies" still seems a contradiction to me...
You don't seem to be in much of a position to make threats, Princess Dimwit. Try to get your turnfile in this time before the Mamulukes march all the way to Byzantium while your army and navy is vacationing in Crete.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Well, you wont be listening to any bickering between Venice and Bavaria.
Bavaria is done responding to all of the goading comments that Venice makes, if you have not figured that out.
Bavaria to Venice, page 34: "This will be my last response to you in any fashion, forum or PM."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Bavaria to Venice, page 34: "This will be my last response to you in any fashion, forum or PM."
Hence I was not responding to him, I was responding to rwingett. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Hence I was not responding to him, I was responding to rwingett. 🙂
My point was that your claim that you are done responding to the doge lacks credibility. You have responded to him many times since page 34.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
My point was that your claim that you are done responding to the doge lacks credibility. You have responded to him many times since page 34.
You're being logical; Heathers hate that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Well, you wont be listening to any bickering between Venice and Bavaria.
Bavaria is done responding to all of the goading comments that Venice makes, if you have not figured that out.
"Bobby, tell your father I am NOT speaking to him, and ask him to pass the salt."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
And he's already got a victory with his opponent resigning after one move? Sounds fishy already.

(Ahem) Aquitaine here.

I was wondering what would possess someone to do that -- make an opening move and then instantly resign. I am reminded of the running gag on the old "Dana Carvey Show" where the two young guys do stupid pranks like paying for their food at a drive-in and then driving off, laughing like maniacs, before the clerk can give them their change OR their food.

On the other hand, I should probably not be surprised to have this immediately become a mini-scandal. Who shall write the GM at Agegames to report me, I wonder?

Seriously speaking, I would like to apologize for my early proclamations as Aquitaine. I had no idea that virtually the entire game was peopled by newcomers to Medieval Diplomacy. It was probably a little rough even had it been a typical game, but I was hoping to split Castile off from his alliance and find myself welcomed to join in his place. That didn't work...

I didn't find out about RHP, by the way, until this weekend. The forum has been an interesting read. I had not been able to understand WHAT Venice had done to inspire such a vigorous attack.

Khan Ozbeg, I'd like to talk to you about how you set up a private game. I've been wanting to do one of those for a while...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gottschalk
Originally posted by rwingett
[b]And he's already got a victory with his opponent resigning after one move? Sounds fishy already.


(Ahem) Aquitaine here.

I was wondering what would possess someone to do that -- make an opening move and then instantly resign. I am reminded of the running gag on the old "Dana Carvey Show" where the two you ...[text shortened]... about how you set up a private game. I've been wanting to do one of those for a while...[/b]
Don't do it. It was way more trouble than it was worth. I'm not going to slag the GMs or anything, but they'll never get top marks for customer service. Between their laconic communications and trying to get 23 virtual retards to commit to play a game was a nightmare I will not willingly ever endure again.

On the surface it seemed so simple: just get 23 people to give you their email address and then you submit the whole list and request a private game. But in practice it was far from simple. The Great Khan still weeps bitter tears at night when he thinks back upon those times.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Gottschalk
Originally posted by rwingett
[b]And he's already got a victory with his opponent resigning after one move? Sounds fishy already.


(Ahem) Aquitaine here.

I was wondering what would possess someone to do that -- make an opening move and then instantly resign. I am reminded of the running gag on the old "Dana Carvey Show" where the two you about how you set up a private game. I've been wanting to do one of those for a while...[/b]
"Vigorous attack"? You mean the mulling around near Venice for seven turns while I and my allies destroyed Arles? I've had sneezing attacks that were more vigorous.

I set up a Napoleonic Empires and that went pretty easy except for the inevitable folding of a major country early in the game. Rob tried to start his around Christmas and the holidays; maybe that had something to do with his difficulties (and he's not the sharpest tool in the shed, either).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
"Vigorous attack"? You mean the mulling around near Venice for seven turns while I and my allies destroyed Arles? I've had sneezing attacks that were more vigorous.

I set up a Napoleonic Empires and that went pretty easy except for the inevitable folding of a major country early in the game. Rob tried to start his around Christmas and the holid ...[text shortened]... something to do with his difficulties (and he's not the sharpest tool in the shed, either).
You get a rec for the first line for making me half-kill myself laughing.

Don't forget with Napoleonic Empires you had the small problem of Poland to deal with.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
"Vigorous attack"? You mean the mulling around near Venice for seven turns while I and my allies destroyed Arles? I've had sneezing attacks that were more vigorous.

I set up a Napoleonic Empires and that went pretty easy except for the inevitable folding of a major country early in the game. Rob tried to start his around Christmas and the holid ...[text shortened]... something to do with his difficulties (and he's not the sharpest tool in the shed, either).
I concede that my timing was part of the problem. A bitter lesson learned.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.