10 Jan 07
Originally posted by Crushing DayDepends how quickly you move. If you're spending 20 seconds on a move you can run out of games to updat quite quickly...😉
How do people keep 30 or more games going at once? I know they have plenty of time for moves because of the game conditions (timebank, etc.), but I do good to keep 10 games going... wouldn't 50 to 100 games going at once become overwhelming or tedious?
10 Jan 07
1 edit
Originally posted by MarinkatombEspecially if you quickly resign a game thinking you've lost and only realise you had at least a draw when your opponent messages you to ask why.
Depends how quickly you move. If you're spending 20 seconds on a move you can run out of games to updat quite quickly...😉
😳
:'(
10 Jan 07
Originally posted by Crushing DayDepends if you are on the dole too, therefore giving you the whole day to move!!
How do people keep 30 or more games going at once? I know they have plenty of time for moves because of the game conditions (timebank, etc.), but I do good to keep 10 games going... wouldn't 50 to 100 games going at once become overwhelming or tedious?
😀
10 Jan 07
Originally posted by Crushing Day1 day per move-- no timebank.
How do people keep 30 or more games going at once? I know they have plenty of time for moves because of the game conditions (timebank, etc.), but I do good to keep 10 games going... wouldn't 50 to 100 games going at once become overwhelming or tedious?
If you put it onto 7 days per move, you could support 7 times the game load. 70 games.
21 days. 21 times the game load, still making the same numbers of moves.
10 Jan 07
Originally posted by Will EverittI find it much more difficult to keep track of a lot of games with a long timeout period than a few faster games, though. I like to play 7 day timeouts, but in slower games than that I often forget what I am up to (of course nobody forces me to wait with my moves to the last minute, but if I have other games in which I need to move faster, I'll wait with the slow games; and of course I could use the note book more, but I am usually too lazy).
1 day per move-- no timebank.
If you put it onto 7 days per move, you could support 7 times the game load. 70 games.
21 days. 21 times the game load, still making the same numbers of moves.
10 Jan 07
1 edit
Originally posted by Nordlys
I find it much more difficult to keep track of a lot of games with a long timeout period than a few faster games, though. I like to play 7 day timeouts, but in slower games than that I often forget what I am up to (of course nobody forces me to wait with my moves to the last minute, but if I have other games in which I need to move faster, I'll wait with the slow games; and of course I could use the note book more, but I am usually too lazy).
11 Jan 07
Originally posted by Crushing DayI used have between 300-350 simultaneously, but now I have almost stop playing. Now I only play few games at one time, perhaps 100-150. This is good because it only take about 10-15 minutes. When I played over 300 games, it could take as long as 30 minutes to make at least one move per game.
How do people keep 30 or more games going at once? I know they have plenty of time for moves because of the game conditions (timebank, etc.), but I do good to keep 10 games going... wouldn't 50 to 100 games going at once become overwhelming or tedious?
Harri / Luck
11 Jan 07
Originally posted by Ian68My art company name is a sarcastic take on my personality, as I am quiet and nowhere near loud! 😉
That doesn't seem particularly expressive, and it's far from an outburst. Maybe I'm just not visualizing it right. How about another log painting, I got that one.
😉😀