Originally posted by PhlabibitWhich post? That last statement is a separate paragraph so I am inferring that you say it as a non-sequitir totally unrelated to the previous statement.
Can you give me an instance where XNZ has picked on 'the weak'? Or is that a separate statement all together and doesn't even have anything to do with XNZ?
Your post is very confusing.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitNo, it was intended as a separate statement. Expressing my general philosophy. I suspect it could encompass XNZ on some occasions like in the Help Forum, but when I made the statement it was intended to stand alone without reference to the content above it.
So the statement is not about XNZ at all?
P-
Why?
Originally posted by Red NightIt makes it seem like XNZ picks on the weak. Are they physically weak, or mentally weak?
No, it was intended as a separate statement. Expressing my general philosophy. I suspect it could encompass XNZ on some occasions like in the Help Forum, but when I made the statement it was intended to stand alone without reference to the content above it.
Why?
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitI put in your edit. The edit makes it clear that one thought is separate from the other.
It makes it seem like XNZ picks on the weak. Are they physically weak, or mentally weak?
P-
Obviously, I dont know who is physically weak or strong. If you read through the forums, you would get the impression that RHP has the toughest, meanest, strongest group of chess players on the planet.
Originally posted by Red NightYou edit says nothing about inferring that XNZ picks on the mentally weak.
I put in your edit. The edit makes it clear that one thought is separate from the other.
Obviously, I dont know who is physically weak or strong. If you read through the forums, you would get the impression that RHP has the toughest, meanest, strongest group of chess players on the planet.
P-