Go back
Name ten people you would like to meet

Name ten people you would like to meet

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SJ247
I have many interesting conversations with people in my daily life.
I cannot honestly think of one infamous person I would want to sit down with for a face-to-face.
Infamous to me doesn't equal a superior being. I know many very intelligent and creative people, all of whom I'd rather spend my time with, over a stranger to me.
I'm just not a "star-struck" kind of person. Notoriety isn't all that impressive to me.

Big deal.
Who said anything about notoriety? Could be even someone from the forums. Could even be me, for example. (riiiiight...)

If you know many "very intelligent and creative people", great. So do I. But if you restrict your world to them, it's a small world indeed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Who said anything about notoriety? Could be even someone from the forums. Could even be me, for example. (riiiiight...)

If you know many "very intelligent and creative people", great. So do I. But if you restrict your world to them, it's a small world indeed.
You've successfully sidetracked us. The history of this thread is showing lists and lists of "famous" people.

Strangelove stated no interest in meeting anyone, outside of forums.

I stated, "I'm with you there." Meaning, yes I'd have an interest in meeting people, but noone in particular with a "famous" name.

Let's get back to it. My original response to you was asking how you know that Strangelove isn't antisocial, but rather placing himself above the population. That makes no sense. Antisocial people aren't necessarily conceited, or lofty.

You came through in your post as ridiculing him for not having an interest in meeting famous people.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 7ate9
WELL STOP BEING SO GOD-DAMMED IGNORANT AS THOUGH I AM STUPID. I KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT HERE. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND THEN DON'T BE SO QUICK TO JUDGE AND READ WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN.

LET ME ASK YOU IF YOU THINK THE SYSTEMS IN THE WORLD ARE RIGHT? NO, THEY ARE NOT AS WE ALLLLLLLLLL KNOW, YET WHENEVER SOMEONE HAS SOMETHING GOOD TO OFFER YOU PEOPLE ...[text shortened]... HEM BUT FOOLISH PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF WHOSE HATRED ROBS THESE GOOD THINGS THAT WRONG PEOPLE DO.
😳😞😴

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SJ247
You've successfully sidetracked us. The history of this thread is showing lists and lists of "famous" people.

Strangelove stated no interest in meeting anyone, outside of forums.

I stated, "I'm with you there." Meaning, yes I'd have an interest in meeting people, but noone in particular with a "famous" name.

Let's get back to it. My original respon ...[text shortened]... in your post as ridiculing him for not having an interest in meeting famous people.
The history of this thread reveals people chose names out of the top of their heads. If they are famous or not is always relative. asromacalcio say some names I had no idea who they were and he felt the same about my list. My list contains people that are interesting to me, but are not famous to the point of "star-struck". Which you were claiming this lists were.

As for Dr. Jekill and Mr Hyde I just claimed I didn't think he was anti-social and that he was trying to show superiority to those wretched star-struck people. I think he interpreted the thread as you did and decided to show superior.

Why else post in a thread that didn't interest him if not to show contempt for those that did?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
The history of this thread reveals people chose names out of the top of their heads. If they are famous or not is always relative. asromacalcio say some names I had no idea who they were and he felt the same about my list. My list contains people that are interesting to me, but are not famous to the point of "star-struck". Which you were claiming this lists ...[text shortened]... y else post in a thread that didn't interest him if not to show contempt for those that did?
Stating "noone" in response to a question, is showing contempt for responders with lists?

My my.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SJ247
Stating "noone" in response to a question, is showing contempt for responders with lists?

My my.
Why state it then?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Why state it then?
For the sake of idle banter.

If anything, his post, along with mine, pointed out a flaw of sorts. Being antisocial is in no way having a feeling of superiority, or greater-than-thou attitude.

Your responses, however, seem to always include some biting little comment.

Why do you care if someone responds stating they'd care to meet noone with a "known name".

Why don't you respond to 789, whose posts seem to have nothing to do with anything.

I think you were somehow offended, wrongly.

Relax yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 7ate9
HI ROOM. JUST BECAUSE MY RESPOSES ARE DIFFERENT IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY HAVE NO PURPOSE OR ACHIEVE GOOD RESULTS. THANK YOU.
I don't personally have any issues with your posts.
I am wondering why plonka jumped on one, and not the others.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SJ247
For the sake of idle banter.

If anything, his post, along with mine, pointed out a flaw of sorts. Being antisocial is in no way having a feeling of superiority, or greater-than-thou attitude.

Your responses, however, seem to always include some biting little comment.

Why do you care if someone responds stating they'd care to meet noone with a "known ...[text shortened]... thing to do with anything.

I think you were somehow offended, wrongly.

Relax yourself.
Your claims that you are anti-social are in complete contradiction with your behaviour in these forums and the claim that you know a lot of intelligent and creative people.

Which is it?


PS: Why should I be offended? It's you that's playing the offended virgin by saying I'm being unfair. Besides, I'm hard to offend, if I seem caustic it's just my normal forum-self.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka

As for Dr. Jekill and Mr Hyde I just claimed I didn't think he was anti-social and that he was trying to show superiority to those wretched star-struck people. I think he interpreted the thread as you did and decided to show superior.

Why else post in a thread that didn't interest him if not to show contempt for those that did?
First, you said I WAS pretending to be something or other - not that you THOUGHT I was.

Second, I didn't say anything about the thread not interesting me - just that I was not interested in meeting so called celebrities. If you think that is showing contempt or superiority, you are wrong.

I have no problem with people wishing to meet the people they say, and likewise I think most have no problem with my choice.

Vote Up
Vote Down

even though the thread as ran off to something else - again - heres my 10.

miguel pinero
kurt cobain
che guevara
jimi Hendrix
karl marx
eric cantona
jimmy carter
brendan o’brien
john lennon
muhammad ali