Originally posted by mochironThe JFK assassination is a worthy conspiracy theory. I'm not saying it's true, but it's worth making the argument.
Add the JFK murder to that list...plus I am sure someone will correlate the
deaths...oh I am sorry ..'Deaths" of Ken Lay and Milosevic...as some grand conspiracy as well.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by Red Nightadd to that the english (the guys at joderal banks decided to stop looking at stars as landing on the moon was more fun, and tracked it all the way to the moon and watched the broadcast off there own signal (one hell of a satalite dish)), and the fact that we measure the distance to the moon by bouncing laser beams of of the mirrors put up there on a pretty much daily basis.
When you put together conspiracy theories try not to come up with ones that require the cooperation of 10s of thousands of people.
Let me take that back 100s of thousands, maybe millions.
The Russians were watching. Don't you think they would have been able to tell if the US hadn't gotten to the moon? Why did they join in the plot?
The whole idea is preposterous.
Originally posted by Sabre1Wow, the story updates with time then. I guess next year it will be
I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet, but the real story is that NASA faked the first moon landing with Neil Armstrong in order to beat the Russians to it. Since then they have been to the moon. Just not when they said they did.
'well the first TWO were faked, the rest were real'
Originally posted by Sabre1The Russians were nowhere near even attempting a moon shot, and they never even tried at any time later. I kind of think THAT argument sucks.
I don't think anyone has mentioned this yet, but the real story is that NASA faked the first moon landing with Neil Armstrong in order to beat the Russians to it. Since then they have been to the moon. Just not when they said they did.
Originally posted by KurtHoeghThe actions of American governments over the years are by far enough evidence to suggest they were dumb enough to risk anything seven times.
Let's assume for a moment, that the moon landings didn't happen.
Tell me then, why they chose to fake it no less than seven times (including the near-disastrous Apollo 13 mission)?
Seven lies makes seven times as many risks of exposure, doesn't it? Why would they risk that? Until someone comes up with a satisfactory answer that question, nothing else matters in my book.