Originally posted by Johnny5Credit card companies have insurance, consumers can get their money back. It isn't just the internet that credit card details are stolen. People who do not keep track of how much they are spending should not have one.
I for one heard to many horror stories of people getting there credit cards ripped and money was not used. I don't subscribe to anything on the internet. but banning people from the site that don't subscribe is judgemental. and if you don't have money you can't play chess. that is abit extreme!
Not having a go at you, of course, considering you aren't judgemental about people who do not subscribe. 🙂
Just mentioning that no matter where you use your credit cards, you are at risk. Just need to keep an eye on your accounts and report any suspicious transactions immediately.
Originally posted by lauseyyour cc isn't the only thing you have to keep an eye on
Credit card companies have insurance, consumers can get their money back. It isn't just the internet that credit card details are stolen. People who do not keep track of how much they are spending should not have one.
Not having a go at you, of course, considering you aren't judgemental about people who do not subscribe. 🙂
Just mentioning that no matt ...[text shortened]... Just need to keep an eye on your accounts and report any suspicious transactions immediately.
Originally posted by jayaitchIf Russell was determined enough, he'd make it possible for many more users to do so.
I know this has been aired before but....why not make non-subscribers pay once they have ceased to have provisional scores?
As it is, they could not even if they wished to. Unless, of course, they're prepared to pay by cheque a total fee amounting to not less than two years' subscription charges.