Other indicatives...
Other indicatives of the present sum of our individual and unique selfhood include: (1) Our individual behavior (sensitivities, manners and
thoughtfulness of others) at an intimate dining room table relative to our intimate behavior in bed and (2) Our self styled prowess approach
to chess games, simulating our decision process and approach to the many crossroads of daily life. Some know little and struggle on anyway,
doing the very best they can. Some do it by the cold standard opening numbers, so to speak. Some throw caution to the wind and seek every
opportunity for tactical gain through wide open, early slashing attacks. Others are willing to wait, content with attempting the slow strategy of
patience in the interest of achieving positional advantage. As with profiles, avatars and nicknames these too are inimitable signatures.
Clarence
The post that was quoted here has been removedPerhaps you will be able, even now, to appreciate this simple logic: If #1, All human beings (including all RHP Members) are unique; and if
#2. Uniqueness seeks constant expression; then, #3. Human beings express and assert their personalities in virtually every decision made.
C
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyNot sure it is as cut and dried as dinner = bed = life = chess? But it does give each person something to think about. My chess is methodical. I see the game as a set of rules (sieze the center, castle early). Apply the rules and guidelines and you will do well. And it has worked (1700+), but I feel something is missing. I need to learn when to burst out from the guidelines and I certainly need to add a more ggressive element to my game. Sacs have been maybe 1-2% of my games (most have lead to wins) and I'm begining to think it might be better if that figure was 10%?
to chess games, simulating our decision process and approach to the many crossroads of daily life.
Damn Gramps, don't start these topics on a Friday night. I'm trying to relax! ðŸ˜
Originally posted by MontyMooseThird request. We need to play a few games... luckily 1700+ also but
Not sure it is as cut and dried as dinner = bed = life = chess? But it does give each person something to think about. My chess is methodical. I see the game as a set of rules (sieze the center, castle early). Apply the rules and guidelines and you will do well. And it has worked (1700+), but I feel something is missing. I need to learn when to burst out ...[text shortened]... was 10%?
Damn Gramps, don't start these topics on a Friday night. I'm trying to relax! ðŸ˜
by way of boring positional play. We either do it here or at your home.
C/gb