Go back
Peace In the General Forum

Peace In the General Forum

General

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-4
1 edit
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

-Removed-
Nice try.

Now try to not be so obvious with what you're doing.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2
Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@suzianne said
First of all, it wasn't an "accusation", as he himself said. And he was not "explicit"ly accusing anybody, and he did not make his non-accusation "to support" Ghost of a Duke in any coincidental "dispute" with anybody.
But Relentless Red has explicitly said that he made the accusation in support of Ghost of a Duke. And he also suggested that what he claims I did to him is "evidence" supporting what Ghost of a Duke claims about me. Have you not read this thread?

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@fmf said
So if Relentless Red has "insufficient information", why are you giving his accusation credence? You are being odd.
Where has it been said Relentless Red has insufficient information or directly accused you? I can only speak for myself and the posts I have read.

Vote Up
4
Vote Down

-Removed-
Oooooooh...if you're forced to resort to an unlikely legal threat: You've lost the argument.

Easier just to say it: "I surrender!"
.

Vote Up
4
Vote Down

-Removed-
Hypocrite.

Vote Up
3
Vote Down

@fmf said
Surely Relentless Red's kafkaesque accusation relies on his claim that there is some sinister meaning in an alleged coincidence? Why do you think I have to defend myself against such a ludicrous and unsubstantiated accusation?
Why are you so adamant about defending yourself against a non-accusation?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@woofwoof said
Oooooooh...if you're forced to resort to an unlikely legal threat: You've lost the argument.

Easier just to say it: "I surrender!"
.
Have you not read the thread?

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

-Removed-
You must be reading a different forum.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-3

@suzianne said
Why are you so adamant about defending yourself against a non-accusation?
The issue is Relentless Red's behaviour. Do you think I hijacked one of his email accounts and used it to destroy his Facebook group? I don't think he does either; I think this is all just toxic banter. So, it's this behaviour on his part that is the issue.

1 edit
Vote Up
4
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Why are you so adamant about defending yourself against a non-accusation?
Mr. Strawman!
Mr. Farmer called.
He says "hay!"

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-4
Vote Up
Vote Down
-5

What a strange line of defence from Relentless Red's apologists. They sound like Trump lawyers defending Trump.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.