Peace In the General Forum

@suzianne said
Both you and FMF are full of camel droppings in this issue, and due only to your partisan desire to inflate Red's remarks into some sort of "offense".

You mustn't have read what he said.

-Removed-

Big words + small mind = stupid remarks.

@fmf said
But Relentless Red has explicitly said that he made the accusation in support of Ghost of a Duke. And he also suggested that what he claims I did to him is "evidence" supporting what Ghost of a Duke claims about me. Have you not read this thread?

I have read the thread. Have you? He made no statement of "support" of anybody. He did say that he was motivated to speak up by your treatment of the Ghost, but stopped well short of saying he was writing "in support" of him. Perhaps you could learn to read without your need to be so precious about something that, yes, explicitly said that he was not accusing you. Clearly you are driven by some need to register "offense", probably merely because he was the author.

-Removed-

You have manufactured the accusation for your own nefarious purposes.

@suzianne said
I have read the thread. Have you? He made no statement of "support" of anybody.

But he did.

@fmf said
The issue is Relentless Red's behaviour. Do you think I hijacked one of his email accounts and used it to destroy his Facebook group? I don't think he does either; I think this is all just toxic banter. So, it's this behaviour on his part that is the issue.

He doesn't think you did either, in fact he said as much.

Have you read the thread?

@suzianne said
He did say that he was motivated to speak up by your treatment of the Ghost, but stopped well short of saying he was writing "in support" of him.

No he didn't. He suggested his accusation was "evidence" that supported Ghost of a Duke's claims about me.

@suzianne said
Have you read the thread?

Yes of course. It is you who is saying stuff as if you haven't.