Go back
Question for 'temporary landlords' in UK

Question for 'temporary landlords' in UK

General

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
26 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Note: 'Temporary landlords = people who need to rent out their own home for a short while (e.g. sabbatical) as opposed to 'capatilistic pigs who buy s..t properties and rent them out at exhortionist prices'.

I need to rent out my London home for a while and will do so at a rent requiring that I 'subsidise' the tenant (s) to the tune of £250 per month.

I have had considerable interest from DSS persons, who seem reasonable. But, many people (e.g. Estate Agents, pesky girlfriend) have warned me 'don't do it - you will end up with legal problems, a wrecked home and the possibility of losing your own home'. The local council, however, guarantee the rent and say 'the tenants must move out at the end of the lease - no problem'.

Does anyone out there have experience of renting via Local Council-DSS? Is it safe?

leestatic
Hristos voskrese

feckin' 'ell

Joined
23 May 05
Moves
19603
Clock
27 Apr 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
Note: 'Temporary landlords = people who need to rent out their own home for a short while (e.g. sabbatical) as opposed to 'capatilistic pigs who buy s..t properties and rent them out at exhortionist prices'.

I need to rent out my London home for a while and will do so at a rent requiring that I 'subsidise' the tenant (s) to the tune of £250 per month.

I

Does anyone out there have experience of renting via Local Council-DSS? Is it safe?
It's more risky as councils have started paying housing benefit straight into the claimants bank account, the best thing is to make the person have a guarantor.

DS

Joined
22 Aug 05
Moves
26450
Clock
27 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by leestatic
It's more risky as councils have started paying housing benefit straight into the claimants bank account, the best thing is to make the person have a guarantor.
The council in my area pays the dss claimed rent directly to the actual owner of the property because too many wouldn't pay their rent with it otherwise.

l

Joined
01 Nov 05
Moves
28256
Clock
27 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by znsho
Note: 'Temporary landlords = people who need to rent out their own home for a short while (e.g. sabbatical) as opposed to 'capatilistic pigs who buy s..t properties and rent them out at exhortionist prices'.

I need to rent out my London home for a while and will do so at a rent requiring that I 'subsidise' the tenant (s) to the tune of £250 per month.

I ...[text shortened]...

Does anyone out there have experience of renting via Local Council-DSS? Is it safe?
As soon as you rent to a tenant, you have given that tenant rights to occupy the property. If that tenant decides after the tenancy has expired, to continue to occupy the premises, you have to go through all sorts of hoops to remove them, which could take up to 2 years to do it legally.

You are obviously very young and naive, to call landlords "capitalist pigs". They have probably experienced the pitfalls of people not paying their rent etc. Get real, they do not make huge money, which if was true they could get a better return from the bank in the past - they rely on capital gains, which as we know, are just not happening.

Unless you really need the money, my advice is do not rent unless you know, have vetted personal references, but with your attitude I doubt that you will realise the pitfalls of renting.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by liquidator
As soon as you rent to a tenant, you have given that tenant rights to occupy the property. If that tenant decides after the tenancy has expired, to continue to occupy the premises, you have to go through all sorts of hoops to remove them, which could take up to 2 years to do it legally.

You are obviously very young and naive, to call landlords "capital ...[text shortened]... onal references, but with your attitude I doubt that you will realise the pitfalls of renting.
I do realise the pitfalls of renting, hence my query. If you saw the state of some 'lets' in London, and the ridiculous rent asked for, you would understand my 'capitalist' jibe. On the other hand, the attitude of some tenants is probably, ultimately, the cause of that.

z

Joined
03 Oct 05
Moves
86698
Clock
28 Apr 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by liquidator
As soon as you rent to a tenant, you have given that tenant rights to occupy the property. If that tenant decides after the tenancy has expired, to continue to occupy the premises, you have to go through all sorts of hoops to remove them, which could take up to 2 years to do it legally.

You are obviously very young and naive, to call landlords "capital ...[text shortened]... onal references, but with your attitude I doubt that you will realise the pitfalls of renting.
You seem to know a lot about this. If the contract is a 'short assured tenancy', would it really take
2 years to evict if the tenants refuse to move? And, during those legal proceedings, must the tenants still pay the monthly rent?

yo its me
Yo! Its been

Me, all along

Joined
14 Jan 07
Moves
64339
Clock
28 Apr 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Are there not plenty of people wanting to rent then? Not that you'd necessily know if they're paying from housing benefit or their own wages becasue as far as it is in my town it's not obvious. I agree with Liquid, you'd be wise to check refences and maybe get a months rent as a deposit. You can charge a few weeks in key money too.

Your local CAB can help you. But they're all very busy.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.