Originally posted by missleadis it also just an urban myth that his IQ was below 100, I think it was said to be around 95 or something like that?
If you guys skipped lessons,well,tell your tech:I have a job for her.
Do any of you guys know at what age Eintsein started to speak?
He was over three years old.
Linda.
Andrew
Originally posted by geniusDo not take the theory of relativity as gospel. There are good reasons why it's not called the LAW of relativity. For one, take the twin paradox. I've been told by various knowledgable people that it's not a true paradox once general relativity (another theory) is taken into account, but none of them has ever been able to explain why in a satisfactory way (i.e., something other than "well, there's a lot of math involved, but trust me, it works"😉.
to travel backwards in time you first must travel faster than the speed of light, which is not possibile as if you were to do that your mass would be infinite and so infinite energy would be needed, which isn't possible
Hypothetical situations aside, particles have been observed to "tunnel" through barriers at speeds of at least 1.7 times the speed of light (see for eaxmple http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/~mpoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html).
Originally posted by royalchickenBut it does represent a powerful message to people who may feel they have nothing to offer as they are told their IQ is low, that they have as much to offer as anyone else in society if they are given a break.
I'd say so. I don't think IQ is a very meaningful statistic, though.
Andrew
...who is concerned about too much testing of kids in UK schools.
Originally posted by latex bishopVery good point. That, I think, was in some ways the original idea. Conversely, it can be used as a guilt trip of sorts...being told that some action is unacceptable from someone because their IQ is high.
But it does represent a powerful message to people who may feel they have nothing to offer as they are told their IQ is low, that they have as much to offer as anyone else in society if they are given a break.
Andrew
...who is concerned about too much testing of kids in UK schools.
~Mark
Who took his first meaningful standardized test this morning (AP exam...)
Originally posted by royalchickenIt represent nothing.
Very good point. That, I think, was in some ways the original idea. Conversely, it can be used as a guilt trip of sorts...being told that some action is unacceptable from someone because their IQ is high.
~Mark
Who took his first meaningful standardized test this morning (AP exam...)
What is important ,is,.You walk into a job.
Originally posted by latex bishopi don't know about his IQ, but wasn't the part of his brain that did maths about 4 times larger than it was meant to be?
But it does represent a powerful message to people who may feel they have nothing to offer as they are told their IQ is low, that they have as much to offer as anyone else in society if they are given a break.
Andrew
...who is concerned about too much testing of kids in UK schools.
yeah-testing isn't good! what with A/B tests, unit assesments, practice assesments, and the final exams, along with our actual course work and homework, and all this during the period when teenages just want to be teenagers!...