13 Nov '15 20:43>
Originally posted by StartreaderNot a problem.
I was puzzled and hadn't spotted the sarcasm. That's all! 🙂
I failed with my sarcasm.
Originally posted by faithj323If you had read the post I was replying to you would not have to make stupid assumptions.
Next time think before you spew.
Here are your own words:
"I'm not celebrating any deaths.
Nor any heroes.
Just the innocent. (ie the vast, vast majority)"
This implies that some/all must be celebrating deaths on Veteran's Day...but you yourself are not.
Yes, there is a minimum IQ to get in which helps to understand why you were not eligible. T ...[text shortened]... t and being a coward. Easy to criticize while others step up and actually serve their countries.
Originally posted by faithj323You better not be including me in those "other posters".
I did not say that about you.
I was referring to comments made by other posters - ones that were insulting to our troops.
Although - you agreeing with this Seitse lowlife on page 2 is a bit concerning.
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedWe, hear in Canada, tend to look after the veterans ( my 99 year old father among them), or some of them, from the two "great" wars and seem to forget those who served after 1945. It seems that with our new government that may change...here's hoping.