Go back
RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

General


Originally posted by Suzianne
Dog and Pony Show -- Wikipedia

"Dog and pony show" is a colloquial term which has come to mean a highly promoted, often over-staged performance, presentation, or event designed to sway or convince opinion for political, or less often, commercial ends. Typically, the term is used in a pejorative sense to connote disdain, jocular lack of appreciation, or d ...[text shortened]...
By the latter part of the 20th century, the original meaning of the term had been largely lost.
If you'd used the web site's message facility to send me stuff like this, I would have kept it confidential.


Originally posted by FMF
Well, you know as well as I do (along with a fair few other people) what was in the message. And you therefore know, as well as I do, and them too, exactly what was the nature and content of the message.
".., exactly what was the nature and content of the message."

"Exactly" what is the nature and content of the message?

It's not threatening or abusive. It's something else. I'll know more, of course, when I see the PM you spread around to your "friends".


Wild West, people. If the mod winds are favorable, the mafia reports. If not, then they take justice in their own hands.

What a shameful hypocrisy. Lack of cojones. Two face morals. The horror!


Originally posted by josephw
It's not threatening or abusive. It's something else. I'll know more, of course, when I see the PM you spread around to your "friends".
Huh? So you know what the nature and the content of the message WASN'T... but you haven't seen it yet? How does that work?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BongalloJoe
Guys, drop it. Does it really matter who is right? Its not like you're gonna be remembered by this thread. Cmon.
Nobody likes arguments. All this does is waste time.
Bongallo Joe,

You appear to be new to me, at least I don't recall noticing you in the forums. Everyone who posts in here likes to argue, that is just the way it is. Personally I love to pull chains. 😉

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kewpie
Oh, for heaven's sake. This "he said - she said - I'm right - you're right" belongs in the schoolyard, and not with the big kids either.

All of you, go and get your books and get back into class, pronto!
Kewpie,

You been around here long enough to know everyone who chats in the General forum loves to argue, or we can call it debate if you wish. Even you love it yourself although I don't know if you would admit it. 😉

-VR

1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
I simply forwarded it to her and a couple a dozen other regulars.
FMF,
I see it has increased by 4 from the last time you talked. You said to 20 of your friends. now it is up to 24....LOL...

-VR


Ladies and gents, we have found the forum's Donald Trump.

Too bad his Melania is in this case a stinking chav.


Originally posted by chaney3
Stop acting like a dipsh't, it's a private, personal message. The sender is relying on the receiver to treat it as such.

FMF broke protocol and needs to apologize. Period.
What makes it a "private, personal message"?
Your opinion?

There is obviously no consensus on this forum.
I don't think FMF needs to apologise.

Whereas using "dipsh't" is generally considered childish and offensive.
Perhaps you need to apologise?



-Removed-
Everyone has an Opinion, doesn't make it correct.

-VR



Speaking of bottoms, how's FMF bottom tasting for you, Quasimodo?

One thing is lacking self esteem due to the lack of hair, another is to
lack self respect at all.


Originally posted by FMF
Huh? So you know what the nature and the content of the message WASN'T... but you haven't seen it yet?
Is that question meant to redirect, or did you honestly misunderstand what I meant when I said "it's not threatening or abusive"?

I obviously read it or I wouldn't have said it's not threatening or abusive. To which I added "it's something else".

It's the "something else" that really concerns me.


Originally posted by josephw
Is that question meant to redirect, or did you honestly misunderstand what I meant when I said "it's not threatening or abusive"?

I obviously read it or I wouldn't have said it's not threatening or abusive. To which I added "it's something else".

It's the "something else" that really concerns me.
There's a doctored version of it in circulation, apparently. sonhouse has been quoting from it ~ I have no reason to believe he was the one who doctored it. Perhaps you have also been manipulated in the same way.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.