Go back
RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

General


Originally posted by FMF
You are correct. But I think robbie was just being a clown spouting buzz words and catchphrases, Very Rusty was being led around by the nose like a gormless donkey, and chaney3 is just an inarticulate abusive guy who likes calling people "pussies" and homosexuals when he's drunk. There hasn't been a genuine debate going on here, your erudite interventions notwithstanding. 😛
FMF,
Hey, very brave words behind your keyboard and the safety of your house....ROFLMAO... Have A Great Day, don't take any wooded nickels!!! 😉

-VR

1 edit

Originally posted by FMF
What on earth are you on about? I have not sent her a single message in the whole ten years I have been here. Back and forth? You haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about. I have only ever interacted with Suzianne in public and if there was something you wanted to alert you should have alerted it. I have never alerted any of her posts.
FMF,
Don't play the id 10 t with me. I've seen your exchanges with her in the forums. You push her as hard as you can. You do have some kind of a problem. Personally I think it is certainly a id 10 t. problem..!~!~

By the way, does me no good to alert posts, because of my past history with the Moderator and the Moderating system in general. You have to go to Russ to actually get any results. He can very fair!!! Don't get me wrong him and I have had our disagreements too, but he wasn't a baby about it, could have booted me off the site if wanted to.

-VR

1 edit

Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,
Hey, very brave words behind your keyboard and the safety of your house....ROFLMAO... Have A Great Day, don't take any wooded nickels!!! 😉

-VR
I would not hesitate ti say it to your face. Your lumbering oaf act is, after all, just a tongue in cheek thing, is it not? We'd have a laugh about it if we met, surely?


Originally posted by FMF
I would not hesitate ti say it to your face. Your lumbering oaf act is, after all, just a tongue in cheek thing, is it not? We'd have a laugh about it if we met, surely?
FMF,

I was talking about all of our faces not just mine. I think you are very brave behind your keyboard. I use to box, so even at my age I wouldn't have any problem in a confrontation with the average joe so to speak.

Now Shortcircuit, I would have second thoughts about...LOL.. Thankfully we are on the same side...I certainly wouldn't say crap to him face to face.

-VR


Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,

I was talking about all of our faces not just mine. I think you are very brave behind your keyboard. I use to box, so even at my age I wouldn't have any problem in a confrontation with the average joe so to speak.

Now Shortcircuit, I would have second thoughts about...LOL.. Thankfully we are on the same side...I certainly wouldn't say crap to him face to face.

-VR
You "used to box"? What on earth has that got to do with anything we're talking about?

1 edit

Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,
Don't play the id 10 t with me. I've seen your exchanges with her in the forums. You push her as hard as you can. You do have some kind of a problem. Personally I think it is certainly a id 10 t. problem..!~!~
That Suzianne and I disagree about things in a debate and discussion forum is neither here nor there. I've never sent her a message in order to make unhinged accusations and threats. That is the kind of clearly-over-the-line behaviour under discussion here.


Originally posted by FMF
You "used to box"? What on earth has that got to do with anything we're talking about?
FMF,

Pay Attention: What this means is I use to box, meaning I wouldn't have a problem confronting the average joe. Why do you have a problem trying to understand this? You do have ID 10 T problem don't you? 😉

-VR


Originally posted by FMF
That Suzianne and I disagree about things in a debate and discussion forum is neither here nor there. I've never sent her a message in order to make unhinged accusations and threats. That is the kind of clearly-over-the-line behaviour under discussion here.
FMF,

NO, what is under discussion here, is your pushing her buttons to the point she sent you a P.M., which she thought would remain that way private, as it should have. Being the big baby you are, you had to share it with 20 of your friends!!!

-VR

1 edit

Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,

I was talking about all of our faces not just mine. I think you are very brave behind your keyboard. I use to box, so even at my age I wouldn't have any problem in a confrontation with the average joe so to speak.

Now Shortcircuit, I would have second thoughts about...LOL.. Thankfully we are on the same side...I certainly wouldn't say crap to him face to face.

-VR
Whereas I would have no problem mocking him to his face and gleefully running away knowing that he could never catch me. 😵


Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,

NO, what is under discussion here, is your pushing her buttons to the point she sent you a P.M., which she thought would remain that way private, as it should have. Being the big baby you are, you had to share it with 20 of your friends!!!

-VR
Its the epitome of cowardice, is it not.


Dumb and Dumber... finally unmasked as Swine and Swiner.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its the epitome of cowardice, is it not.
You mean making daft and nasty threats using the web site's message facility, rather than out in the open on the forum, and hoping that the recipient will keep this bizarre personal abuse secret... that's "the epitome of cowardice"? Or do you mean confronting this behaviour as a matter of principle in the full knowledge that there will be sustained criticism and attempted ridicule in certain quarters as a consequence?


Originally posted by Very Rusty
FMF,

Pay Attention: What this means is I use to box, meaning I wouldn't have a problem confronting the average joe. Why do you have a problem trying to understand this? You do have ID 10 T problem don't you? 😉

-VR
You are talking about you using violence as a reaction to things discussed on this thread? Surely not? Don't be so mealy mouthed about this "confronting the average joe" nonsense. You and I disagree about whether Suzianne should have been reported to the Mods for making threats, and now you're suddenly talking about how you 'used to box"? What on earth is this all about?


Originally posted by FMF
You are talking about you using violence as a reaction to things discussed on this thread? Surely not? Don't be so mealy mouthed about this "confronting the average joe" nonsense. You and I disagree about whether Suzianne should have been reported to the Mods for making threats, and now you're suddenly talking about how you 'used to box"? What on earth is this all about?
FMF,

Don't get your panties all in a bunch there or have a panic attack. I merely pointed out that I would have no problem talking to you or most for that matter in person. Boxing indicated I can take care of myself should a physical confrontation happen. I would not be the least bit concerned. Especially where you are concerned.

I think you fight women better than men if you want my honest opinion. I don't think your much of a Gentleman the way you conducted yourself in your and suz's war of words. You do owe her an apology for showing 20 of your friends, didn't think you had that many to be honest with you again!!! Suz would probably take you out herself if it came down to a physical confrontation!

-VR


Originally posted by Very Rusty
Don't get your panties all in a bunch there or have a panic attack. I merely pointed out that I would have no problem talking to you or most for that matter in person. Boxing indicated I can take care of myself should a physical confrontation happen. I would not be the least bit concerned. Especially where you are concerned.
Why on earth would you think a "physical confrontation" would happen? You are talking utter nonsense.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.