Scammer on RHP

@fmf said
No. I explicitly don't, As you well know after 70+ forum pages where it was explained to you. You are grasping.

When you take the cheap shot and call somebody delusional you are very much using the mental health connotations of the word to reinforce your argument that the person concerned is unstable or "unhinged".

@ghost-of-a-duke said
In light of his posts, the action taken against him was warranted. - But that is a separate issue from you going out of your way to repeatedly provoke him. I could often predict his outbursts based on what you posted.

Executioner Brand stalked me and I didn't indulge his racism, misogyny and Islamophobia including his incessant talk about pedophilia. Russ was right to ban him. You wanted there to be nothing done about him?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
When you take the cheap shot and call somebody delusional you are very much using the mental health connotations of the word to reinforce your argument that the person concerned is unstable or "unhinged".

"Delusional" is an everyday English word that is hundreds of years older than its use by psychiatrists. Suzianne posts loads of unhinged stuff. I am not a psychiatrist.

@fmf said
You wanted there to be nothing done about him?

Why do you repeatedly pretend you haven't read what I posted? Here it is again:

"In light of his posts, the action taken against him was warranted."

@ghost-of-a-duke said
to reinforce your argument that the person concerned is unstable or "unhinged".

If you think Suzianne's posting is stable and hinged, that's your prerogative.

@fmf said
"Delusional" is an everyday English word that is hundreds of years older than its use by psychiatrists. Suzianne posts loads of unhinged stuff. I am not a psychiatrist.

You don't think delusional has mental health connotations?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you repeatedly pretend you haven't read what I posted? Here it is again:

"In light of his posts, the action taken against him was warranted."

"In light of his posts, the action taken against him was warranted."

Good then we are agreed. It was his behaviour that got him banned 15 times, not mine.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You don't think delusional has mental health connotations?

No. It's a regular everyday English word. Go back and read those 70+ forum pages you appear to be pretending to have forgotten.

@fmf said
"In light of his posts, the action taken against him was warranted."

Good then we are agreed. It was his behaviour that got him banned 15 times, not mine.

You provoked him, and it was that provocation that led to his behaviour, that got him banned.

@fmf said
No. It's a regular everyday English word. Go back and read those 70+ forum pages you appear to be pretending to have forgotten.

I don't think even you believe that.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
You provoked him, and it was that provocation that led to his behaviour, that got him banned.

Nope. He stalked me from thread to thread, unable to disguise his identity, because of his odious posts. And I alerted Russ. Did you really not see any of the exchanges?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I don't think even you believe that.

And yet I do. And you pretending that I don't is one of your feeblest riffs.

@fmf said
Nope. He stalked me from thread to thread, unable to disguise his identity, because of his odious posts. And I alerted Russ. Did you really not see any of the exchanges?

Again, you provoked him, and it was that provocation that led to his behaviour, that got him banned. Why did you do that when you knew he had issues?

But yes, clearly he carries a grudge against you in following accounts, but this still owes it's origin to your initial and ongoing/relentless provocation.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Again, you provoked him, and it was that provocation that led to his behaviour, that got him banned.

You are mistaken.

@fmf said
And yet I do. And you pretending that I don't is one of your feeblest riffs.

You often reference my feeble riffs, while simultaneously making a feeble post that convinces nobody.