Go back
Sissy Boy Slap Party

Sissy Boy Slap Party

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
The bar is respondsible for all ID's real or false
that's what i'm saying to.

although it may be different from state to state in america as no1twit has said, i don't know.

from past experience it's the bars responsibilities in florida.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
The bar is respondsible for all ID's real or false
That is just not correct in NY.

Alcoholic Beverage Control Act 65(4):

In any
proceeding pursuant to subdivision one of this section, it shall be an
affirmative defense that such person had produced a photographic
identification card apparently issued by a governmental entity and that
the alcoholic beverage had been sold, delivered or given to such person
in reasonable reliance upon such identification.

http://law.onecle.com/new-york/alcoholic-beverage-control/ABC065_65.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

do i need to say it a third time? 😵

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Because I think Internet laws and liquor laws have some overlapping similarities in the USA. Bars have bouncers and RHP has bouncers. Each business has age limit restrictions.
liquor laws are different all other the world, rhp's aren't.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
ok i'll change my wording. the site is a 13+ site but if any legal matters came up for anyone aged 13-17 it would be in the hands of the person who can legally enter a contract. in this instance the person that the 13-17 year old used for their subscription purchase.

better?
No, it is not. The provision is as follows:

3. YOUR REGISTRATION OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of your use of the Service, you represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract

You (the user) must represent that they are of a legal age to form a binding contract. The rest of the paragraph spells out other obligations of the user like not making multiple accounts or using an engine. These provisions are binding on the user, not anybody else.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
That is just not correct in NY.

Alcoholic Beverage Control Act 65(4):

In any
proceeding pursuant to subdivision one of this section, it shall be an
affirmative defense that such person had produced a photographic
identification card apparently issued by a governmental entity and that
the alcoholic bev ...[text shortened]... uch identification.

http://law.onecle.com/new-york/alcoholic-beverage-control/ABC065_65.html
so in NY the bar is not respondsible for an under age person acquireing alcholol with false ID? WRONG

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
ROFLMAO...It is spelled liar, and no I didn't, I saw no need it is a chess site, and pennys a day to use. I don't think I even read it over my self until I was here for quite awhile.

I know I was told to remember it was a G-rated 13+ site, by a mod in a friendly message on something I had said in the forum, and no I am not going to repeat it. 😛
so you managed that one all by your selfness? good for you 😛

i think you told me about that already.

edit: btw stop making fun of my dyslexia 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
so in NY the bar is not respondsible for an under age person acquireing alcholol with false ID? WRONG
I guess you can't read; typing "WRONG" doesn't change NY ABC 65(4).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
that's what i'm saying to.

although it may be different from state to state in america as no1twit has said, i don't know.

from past experience it's the bars responsibilities in florida.
Liquor laws are regulated by federal laws...States can make them more strict, but can not legally reduce them.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
that was the worst example ever. if a bar serves booze to anyone under aged it doesn't matter if they used fake id or whatever, it's the bar responsibilities for not serving anyone under the legal age and they, the bar will get fined in caught.

and i have my u.s hat on here.
That simply not true. The way they catch them is by doing sting operations. As long as they always ask to see your ID they won't get caught. They don't even need to check if you look like you're 30 which is an opinion so they can get out of most fines anyway.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I guess you can't read; typing "WRONG" doesn't change NY ABC 65(4).
Link it? Refering to your posted statue.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
so you managed that one all by your selfness? good for you 😛

i think you told me about that already.

edit: btw stop making fun of my dyslexia 😠
A lawyer was not needed. Come on it is a chess site with forums on it. That we pay pennys a day for. 😉

There are some contracts, you or I could not understand unless we are lawyers. Some are very complicated, it only takes a word to change the whole meaning of something, and once signed, it is legally binding.

Sorry to hear about your problem with dyslexia, if you are telling the truth, if not shame on you!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
that's what i'm saying to.

although it may be different from state to state in america as no1twit has said, i don't know.

from past experience it's the bars responsibilities in florida.
Really?

Florida’s Dram Shop Law does allow the victims of drink driving accidents to sue bars, hotels or restaurants that sell alcohol to underage teens who are injured or injure others as a result, if the bar either didn’t ask for an ID or ignored an obviously fake ID.

http://seelielaw.com/blog/archives/181/comment-page-1

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YEAH BOY
Link it? Refering to your posted statue.
I already did. 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
liquor laws are different all other the world, rhp's aren't.
They still have to comply with international law, as well as the laws in the land they sell their products in.