Originally posted by robbie carrobieIsn't this just basically the same catchphrases strung together yet again?
Have I not stated that I am uninterested in your interrogation, your issues, your reasons or much you have to say on the matter of gays and gayness? is it not the height of rudeness to keep on pestering someone when they have asked you to desist annoying them? Please pester someone else you odious fellow!
Originally posted by FMFDude you are just not much fun, sorry to have to tell you so bluntly. Please don't take it badly. There is nothing light and airy about you, you have a very heavy touch, stomp around on the ground instead of walking lightly, everything for you is a serious issue, There is just no fun to be had with someone like you. I am not even going to try to attempt to understand the reason for it, it is what it is and well as I have stated perhaps someone like your friend divegeester finds that your approach holds some interest but personally, well you know, I've seen enough already.
Isn't this just basically the same catchphrases strung together yet again?
1 edit
-Removed-Sir I have really no idea what you are talking about, seriously, it seems that you have your own kind of reality, propped up by your own propaganda. As I have stated neither you nor your friend are much fun, sorry if that offends you or you find it difficult to accept but its true for me anyway. Perhaps someone else finds what you have to say interesting and engaging, but personally, well, I have seen enough already. Insinuate what you like but I will not be reading it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis thread is about 50 people being gunned down in cold blood by a mass murderer for being homosexuals. What "fun" and "light and airy" stuff are you looking for?
Dude you are just not much fun, sorry to have to tell you so bluntly. Please don't take it badly. There is nothing light and airy about you, you have a very heavy touch, stomp around on the ground instead of walking lightly, everything for you is a serious issue, There is just no fun to be had with someone like you.
Originally posted by FMFI already spoke directly to the issue. You haven't.
Perhaps you could speak directly to the issue I am raising with you with this question: Do you believe that homosexuals are actually heterosexuals?
But, since you seem to be having difficulty assimilating and juxtaposing simple concepts related to morality, I'll indulge your weakness.
Your question, "do you believe that homosexuals are actually heterosexuals" isn't germane to the subject, but instead is an attempt to deflect, which is in reality an act of denial.
The issue being discussed is related to the morality of homosexuality and other deviances. The question you posed is not only not relevant, it is a bizarre concept without rational purpose for critical thought. It's like asking whether a dog is a cat or a bear a moose. It has no meaning and defies logic and truth.
Originally posted by FMFWe've already established that it was wrong. Their sexual preferences not withstanding.
This thread is about 50 people being gunned down in cold blood by a mass murderer for being homosexuals. What "fun" and "light and airy" stuff are you looking for?
Now let's move on to "light and airy" things, like morality. 😉
Originally posted by josephwI think, when you use the word "morality" here, you are in fact referring to "sin" which I take to mean acts that you believe are transgressions of God's will. "Morality" and "sin" are not synonymous.
The issue being discussed is related to the morality of homosexuality and other deviances.
Originally posted by josephw"Denial" of what exactly? There is no shortage of reactionary religious people with strong views who claim that there are no such people as homosexuals, just perverted heterosexuals, or words to that effect. With your trenchant condemnation of homosexuals, I am asking you if you subscribe to such a stance on human sexuality. It is absolutely germane.
Your question, "do you believe that homosexuals are actually heterosexuals" isn't germane to the subject, but instead is an attempt to deflect, which is in reality an act of denial.