So, it turns out that the Florida Shooter was Gay

Originally posted by FMF
But it's also true because you are perhaps the most predictable poster here and you don't leave much to the imagination.

Praise indeed from RHP's resident cardboard cut out, FMF the mosquito, a single mode of attack, the interrogation troll routine. How banal, how unimaginative, how uncreative, how so thoroughly dull. look how you reduce almost every thread you are in to fruitless nitpicking, finger pointing, attempts to humiliate others, is it really the best you can proffer, i mean really?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Praise indeed from RHP's resident cardboard cut out, FMF the mosquito, a single mode of attack, the interrogation troll routine. How banal, how unimaginative, how uncreative, how so thoroughly dull. look how you reduce almost every thread you are in to fruitless nitpicking, finger pointing, attempts to humiliate others, is it really the best you can proffer, i mean really?

Well I'm not attempting to be a comedian, if that's what you mean. And, yes, you never seem to fare well when you try to debate or discuss anything with me, if that's what you mean. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
Well I'm not attempting to be a comedian, if that's what you mean. And, yes, you never seem to fare well when you try to debate or discuss anything with me, if that's what you mean. 😉

You are an incidental comedian because you expect people to take you seriously, its hilarious.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You are an incidental comedian because you expect people to take you seriously, its hilarious.

Is this an example of you posting in what you claim is an 'imaginative' and 'creative' and 'non-dull' way which seemed to be the main thing you were insinuating with your post at the bottom of the previous page? 😉

Originally posted by FMF
Is this an example of you posting in what you claim is an 'imaginative' and 'creative' and 'non-dull' way which seemed to be the main thing you were insinuating with your post at the bottom of the previous page? 😉

I dont want to hurt your feelings dude but the text was plain, the funniest thing about you is that you think your drool has merit and you want people to take your slobber seriously, its hilarious. Dude you are like some smelly old cheese, so mature that you have become offensive to the senses.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dont want to hurt your feelings dude but the text was plain, the funniest thing about you is that you think your drool has merit and you want people to take your slobber seriously, its hilarious. Dude you are like some smelly old cheese, so mature that you have become offensive to the senses.

Oh look, several of your catchphrases!

Originally posted by FMF
So you don't condemn mass murderers and you don't condemn child rapists?

I already answered that line of questioning.

Now, back to the topic. The topic isn't about anyone condemning anyone as much as you would like it to be, because without making that up you have nothing to say concerning morality except your own sense of what is moral and what is not.

"I certainly endeavour to live my life in a morally sound way..."

It appears that you think you know what is morally sound. You state that you endeavor to live in a morally sound way. That implies that you have a moral code of conduct.

So I'm going to ask the obvious question, and you're going to retort with what you think is the answer.

Is your moral code one that you invented or did you learn it from some outside source?

Now don't forget you said you try to be as forthright and honest as you can be.

FMF: So you don't condemn mass murderers and you don't condemn child rapists?

Originally posted by josephw
I already answered that line of questioning.

Did you? In which post ~ which page?

Originally posted by josephw
...you have nothing to say concerning morality except your own sense of what is moral and what is not.

But, josephw, you have nothing to say concerning morality except your own sense of what is moral and what is not ~ which happens to be your personal decision to subscribe to ancient Hebrew mythology and its offshoot, Christianity. Aside from that, you have made no proper arguments about the "morality" of homosexuality. I have offered arguments that don't resort to citing a supernatural being the very existence of which you and I can find no consensus on.

Originally posted by josephw
Is your moral code one that you invented or did you learn it from some outside source?

I already answered this question on page 14.

Originally posted by FMF
But, josephw, [b]you have nothing to say concerning morality except your own sense of what is moral and what is not ~ which happens to be your personal decision to subscribe to ancient Hebrew mythology and its offshoot, Christianity. Aside from that, you have made no proper arguments about the "morality" of homosexuality. I have offered arguments that don't ...[text shortened]... t to citing a supernatural being the very existence of which you and I can find no consensus on.[/b]

Can't answer the question? How do you know what's moral and what's not?

Originally posted by josephw
It appears that you think you know what is morally sound. You state that you endeavor to live in a morally sound way. That implies that you have a moral code of conduct.

Like I said ~ a dozen or so pages ago, although I note that you simply ignored it ~ I certainly endeavour to live my life in a morally sound way - to try not to damage others, not to deceive them, and not to coerce them, and to try to navigate my way through the complexities of life while transgressing these principles as infrequently as possible and to always exercise empathy - I am sure we are alike in this respect.

Originally posted by josephw
Can't answer the question? How do you know what's moral and what's not?

I have answered the question more than once already. And by suggesting yet again that I haven't, you appear to be sidestepping this: Aside from referring to the religious beliefs that you just so happen to have, you have made no proper arguments about the "morality" (or otherwise) of homosexuality. I have offered arguments that don't resort to citing a supernatural being - the very existence of which you and I can find no consensus on.

Originally posted by FMF
I have answered the question more than once already. And by suggesting [b]yet again that I haven't, you appear to be sidestepping this: Aside from referring to the religious beliefs that you just so happen to have, you have made no proper arguments about the "morality" (or otherwise) of homosexuality. I have offered arguments that don't resort to citing a supernatural being - the very existence of which you and I can find no consensus on.[/b]

It's a simple question. You have a moral code. You've said as much.

The question shouldn't be so difficult for you to find an answer to. Take your time.

From what source do you attribute your morality? How did you arrive at an understanding of what is moral or not? Did it come from within, or did you learn it?

Originally posted by josephw
It's a simple question. You have a moral code. You've said as much.

The question shouldn't be so difficult for you to find an answer to. Take your time.

From what source do you attribute your morality? How did you arrive at an understanding of what is moral or not? Did it come from within, or did you learn it?

Good grief, josephw. What kind of debating is this? Like I said, I have already answered this question. I did so on page 14.