Originally posted by Very RustyIf the person(s) claim to be la lawyer and are demonstrating such flagrant ignorance of "the law" :-
You just said he has a double account...Now can you prove that? you are saying he is in violation of section "a" with no proof! Brilliant lawyer you are...LMAO...!
- In some cultures one can call themselves a "street" lawyer, accountant, teacher, doctor without possessing recognised qualification in that area.
- Email spam offers cheap internet degrees as well as the regular spam.
- Perhaps RHP welcomes its doors to all and this includes people posting from the ip address of a mental hospital. Its not RHP's fault.
Originally posted by JieActually it`s RHP admins fault for allowing anonymous trolls to change their accounts, switching to another account when nobody takes them (with their pathetic claims) serious anymore.
If the person(s) claim to be la lawyer and are demonstrating such flagrant ignorance of "the law" :-
- In some cultures one can call themselves a "street" lawyer, accountant, teacher, doctor without possessing recognised qualification in that area.
- Email spam offers cheap internet degrees as well as the regular spam.
- Perhaps RHP welcomes its doors to a ...[text shortened]... this includes people posting from the ip address of a mental hospital. Its not RHP's fault.
Originally posted by Korchand what would you do to combat this o great one? its easy to throw accusations about without giving any alternatives to the present system. the simple fact is that nothing can be changed regarding this matter if someone wants to create more than one account there is nothing RHP or someone else can do about it.
Actually it`s RHP admins fault for allowing anonymous trolls to change their accounts, switching to another account when nobody takes them (with their pathetic claims) serious anymore.
Originally posted by trev33Really? Numerous accounts were banned for violating 3(a); far more than were for 3(b) as the "Removed Players List" showed when it existed.
and what would you do to combat this o great one? its easy to throw accusations about without giving any alternatives to the present system. the simple fact is that nothing can be changed regarding this matter if someone wants to create more than one account there is nothing RHP or someone else can do about it.
Originally posted by trev33There have been persons banned for multiple accounts before. So I doubt if RHP admins are so helpless. Only it seems to me that exceptions are made for some persons.....
and what would you do to combat this o great one? its easy to throw accusations about without giving any alternatives to the present system. the simple fact is that nothing can be changed regarding this matter if someone wants to create more than one account there is nothing RHP or someone else can do about it.
Originally posted by trev33Imagine if someone went to the police station claiming to be "a lawyer" and says they should arrest someone because the law might be broken? Really? Says Mr Policeman, what evidence do you have a crime has been committed, None says the liar arhem "laywer". I only have my word for it says the liar.
and what would you do to combat this o great one? its easy to throw accusations about without giving any alternatives to the present system. the simple fact is that nothing can be changed regarding this matter if someone wants to create more than one account there is nothing RHP or someone else can do about it.
Mr Policeman :- What type of a liar are you?
Mr Laywer :- I'm not a lawyer, I'm a liar.
Originally posted by trev33What stops a thief from stealing again? Besides internal controls that nobody else can effect, the threat of punishment. It's true it's not much of a bother to just start up a new account after you've been banned, but you do lose all your game history and accomplishments and even have to hide your persona a bit. It's a bit of a nuisance if nothing else.
what is stopping them from coming back? this is what i was talking about.
The site rules clearly bar using multiple accounts and that prohibition has been somewhat aggressively enforced in the past. That's what I am talking about.
Originally posted by JieYour inability to see difference between arrest and verdict of guilty only shows your absolute lack of law knowledge. To say nothing about your cheap demagogy.
Imagine if someone went to the police station claiming to be "a lawyer" and says they should arrest someone because the law might be broken? Really? Says Mr Policeman, what evidence do you have a crime has been committed, None says the liar arhem "laywer". I only have my word for it says the liar.
Mr Policeman :- What type of a liar are you?
Mr Laywer :- I'm not a lawyer, I'm a liar.
Originally posted by no1marauderThe site allows free users and paid up members/subscribers. However the site has a TOS that means even paid up members can be nuked for breaking the TOS. There are plenty of examples of two paid up members using abusive/insulting words contrary to section 6 of the TOS in this thread alone.
I've been posting here for more than 4 years, I've even paid for that privilege.
How about you?