1 edit
Originally posted by StarrmanWell, I have to give you credit in that respect. Hope the follow-up url gave you the proof you were looking for.
Why can't you believe it? I'm just not gullible enough to accept things at face value, especially when they come through degrees of seperation. IMO it's a shame more people don't think that way.
Cheers
Originally posted by EAPOEblowing up a whale, what a crap solution that was, nearly as crap as the way they handled the siege at waco
Oh my God, reminds me of something else that got caught by the tide. . .
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3712178515303087869
Booooommmmmmmmmmmmm....................................
Originally posted by CrowleyI thought it was odd that were 4 women. I suspect though that it was the women who came up with the idea that if they rode out there and the horses saw the other horses in the water, that they could get them to follow.
I suppose 4 guys on horseback would've yielded the same results - but they were all at work, trying to make enough money to support their wives' horse-riding hobby...
Sometimes women can solve things men can't because they don't think along the terms of brute force.
1 edit
Originally posted by arrakisWhat a shile of pite!
Did you hear about the horses that were trapped for 3 days on a tiny piece of land in wind and rain in the Netherlands in November?
It had the nation mesmerized, watching about 100 horses huddle against the wind and watching 18 of them die. First firemen, then the Dutch army tried to rescue them, both unsuccessfully.
[b]Then four women rode out on hor ...[text shortened]... 1 minute after the start.
http://video.google.nl:80/videoplay?docid=-4584913278289860160[/b]
100 horses wade through ankle deep water. Total waste of time, especially considering horses are strong swimmers.
A real anticlimax after seeing Attenborough's recent documentary following a young wildebeest through it's migration through Tanzania and Kenya.
D
Originally posted by arrakisJesus H Christ! It's not exactly rocket science. Ever hear of herd mentality?
I thought it was odd that were 4 women. I suspect though that it was the women who came up with the idea that if they rode out there and the horses saw the other horses in the water, that they could get them to follow.
Sometimes women can solve things men can't because they don't think along the terms of brute force.
Donkey see, donkey do.
D
Originally posted by arrakisFair enough.
I can't believe you'd say something like that. Here!
http://bridlepath.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/dutch-rescuers-try-to-save-trapped-horses/
"The nearest land was only a few hundred metres away but there were fears that submerged barbed wire might hurt the horses if they tried to swim to safety."
D
Originally posted by RagnorakYou must be drunk, Raggy. Anyone can see the water is NOT ankle deep. I'm not even going to waste my time with your other posts. I suggest you go sleep it off.
What a shile of pite!
100 horses wade through ankle deep water. Total waste of time, especially considering horses are strong swimmers.
A real anticlimax after seeing Attenborough's recent documentary following a young wildebeest through it's migration through Tanzania and Kenya.
D
Originally posted by arrakisThe point being that there was a storm, some horses died, the storm abated, the horses *walked* to safety. I don't see anything heart warming about horses dying.
You must be drunk, Raggy. Anyone can see the water is NOT ankle deep. I'm not even going to waste my time with your other posts. I suggest you go sleep it off.
Also, I don't really like your tactic of attacking the character of people who disagree with you. This is something you have employed numerous times in the past, with Noodles, No1Marauder, Xanthos, etc, etc. Now, to be honest, your posts where you show your feminine side "Oh, I'm soooo ashamed of myself because I just ate a cheese burger", your sexist postings, where you call random women "babe", and your devious method of extracting women's home addresses by sponsoring a tournament give me the impression that you could be a rapist or at the very least a stalker, but I don't think it's in the nature of these forums to bring these impressions into the public eye.
Continue to attack people by calling them alcoholics, man-haters, etc, but, to be honest, it just shows you to be the bitter, twisted, little, dirty old man that you really are.
Have a good one.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakRagnarok - 1, Arrakis - 0
The point being that there was a storm, some horses died, the storm abated, the horses *walked* to safety. I don't see anything heart warming about horses dying.
Also, I don't really like your tactic of attacking the character of people who disagree with you. This is something you have employed numerous times in the past, with Noodles, No1Marauder, Xan ...[text shortened]... e bitter, twisted, little, dirty old man that you really are.
Have a good one.
D