Originally posted by EcstremeVenombut were the U.S. we had inspection agents crawling all over Iraq without saddam knowing...
it seems everyone forgot why it started. after the first war in iraq we came to an agreement that saddam should not have Weapons of Mass Destruction and we would be allowed to check for weapons (do a wikipedia Gulf War search you may find it there). when suddenly after 9/11, saddam refused to allow us to inspect, we gave him 24 hours to let us inspect ...[text shortened]... 1, which is totally wrong. so what is so wrong about starting war because saddam broke a treaty?
Originally posted by Peachysaddam couldve easily got them out of the country any time just before or after the war started, before we could find them. the war continued so that we could capture saddam, for not allowing us to inspect for WMDs. which would reasonably lead bush (correctly) to believe he had WMDs. why else would he refuse inspection?
To my understanding, what started the war were the WMD's, and when these were not found, Al-Queda was used to justify.
I don't buy it.
Originally posted by Deathyxbut before peachy was claiming that it was a war against terrorism and you agreed. now you say it is a war started because of WMDs. are you just making up new theories after another?
but were the U.S. we had inspection agents crawling all over Iraq without saddam knowing...
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomno... i didnt agree with you on the fact that it started because of wmd's... I said we had inspection agents all over Iraq even when we weren't aloud inspection... We all know that... So bush going to war with Iraq becuz we werent aloud inspection is a lil fishy... I still stick with the only theory i stated...
but before peachy was claiming that it was a war against terrorism and you agreed. now you say it is a war started because of WMDs. are you just making up new theories after another?
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomI tell you whats wrong..
it seems everyone forgot why it started. after the first war in iraq we came to an agreement that saddam should not have Weapons of Mass Destruction and we would be allowed to check for weapons (do a wikipedia Gulf War search you may find it there). when suddenly after 9/11, saddam refused to allow us to inspect, we gave him 24 hours to let us inspect ...[text shortened]... 1, which is totally wrong. so what is so wrong about starting war because saddam broke a treaty?
Instead of America raging a war in Afghanistan, Iraq, threatened Syria and Libya, they should invest these billions of dollars on education, health and help poorer countries etc etc etc ...
The first gulf war was a conflict between two Arabic states and it should have been resolved by their neighbours help.
The second gulf war was merely an act of asserting power, like a male monkey screwing another male to assert his dominance in the group.
The UN not the US should have dealt with WMD's issue
The UN should be dealing with this issue right now in Korea.. where are they?
Peace will never be restored until the US leaves Iraq.
Thats whats wrong. Everything.
Originally posted by Deathyxwhat makes you think that we had agents inspecting even when we werent allowed to? is that fact? or assumption?
no... i didnt agree with you on the fact that it started because of wmd's... I said we had inspection agents all over Iraq even when we weren't aloud inspection... We all know that... So bush going to war with Iraq becuz we werent aloud inspection is a lil fishy... I still stick with the only theory i stated...
Originally posted by Peachywe're not talking about the first two wars, we're talking about the war now. maybe the first two were wrong, idk much about them because they are before my time. but there were certain treaties that were broken, not allowing inspection. when you break a treaty you start a war.
I tell you whats wrong..
Instead of America raging a war in Afghanistan, Iraq, threatened Syria and Libya, they should invest these billions of dollars on education, health and help poorer countries etc etc etc ...
The first gulf war was a conflict between two Arabic states and it should have been resolved by their neighbours help.
The second gulf wa ...[text shortened]... ey?
Peace will never be restored until the US leaves Iraq.
Thats whats wrong. Everything.
1 edit
Originally posted by DeathyxAhh, so yo're not a hippie, then?
True some will flame... oh well... Um... Totally for... I mean there is no way our country would be safe if we didnt do what we did... Without a significant force in the middle east and an even more significant impact we have made on Al Queda I really think 9/11 would be just the tip of the ice berg...
ðŸ˜